The more I consider this the angrier I become – where are the reassurances from Peninsula about this resort???
Prove to me that the guaranteed rental scheme is not an absolute nonsense. Your website quotes –
“When you are not there, make money:
Take advantage of the 2, 3, 5 or 10 year renewable guaranteed rental programmes we have set up, underwritten by one of Spains leading Insurance companies, and in association with some of the worlds leading tour operators. This is a REAL guarantee, not just a vague promise of income, as is offered by some other developers! You can choose from schemes which allow limited access to your property or a more flexible approach. Yields can be between 5% and 15% of purchase price per year depending on your chosen program.”
Who are the leading tour operators involved? Please elaborate on some names. Why keep this a secret when it may surely only help your business? You have contributed to this forum when it suits your needs so why not now?
Tour operators produce their own marketing literature well in advance and completions on ME23 took place months ago. The rental scheme suggests that a 6 month time period needs to be given but clearly there does not seem to be any marketing of this resort or indeed any major tour operators interested. Why on earth would they be??
Why is Margaret Corley advertising ME23 on such a low budget website – this isn’t just for her own personal apartment as the ad mentions the availability of a number of apartments. http://www.euroletting.co.uk/index.php?action=listingview&listingID=919&printer_friendly=yes
What response would I now get from “The Money Doctor” – John Lowe who is quoted on your website extolling the virtues of this seemingly sure-fire investment?
I understand that Spanish consumer law generally favours those purchasing for personal use and not investment but surely the fact that this development is heavily marketed on the basis of guaranteed rental schemes without personal use must be considered.
What about consumer laws specific to the region that underline the importance of financial transparency?
What really is the situation with the “Balcons”? Tee 17 is being developed by Proadis – if things go wrong here will Peninsula react in a similar way? What is the significance of Sharon H’s employment in this situation (see the thread)?
Once again I would appreciate any responses as I am worried about this – please use this forum to give myself and fellow pruchasers some degree of re-assurance.