24 Oct 2019 9:47 PM:

Hi Brenda

Could you please tell us at what stage your case was won, was it the Supreme Court level?

Thread: Full Deposit Plus Fees Refunded

--------------------------------------

11 Jun 2019 4:57 PM:

Hello Maria

I do not fully understand the Supreme Court Rulings in these cases but does the part about ' It is enough to know or not to ignore) who knew or had to know said literally said sentence of November 2017) that the buyers were entering amounts on account of the price of homes under construction to answer for not having demands from the promoter the opening of a special account, separated and duly guaranteed......

Does this help our case? We are with Costaluz and our case was lost because the Bank would not accept that the account that our money (exact amount to the penny) was paid into an account in their Bank. They stated that the account it was paid into was not the numbered account stated on the contract with the developers/builders of our home who had gone bankrupt,  but had been paid to an Estate Agent account who then paid it into the Developers Bank.

This argument was upheld by the Appeal Court when you appealed against Bank with Ley57/68, even though you had won our case against the Developers.

 We have waited since December 2017 for our case to come to the Supreme Court, does this latest ruling give us some hope that when our case does come to the Supreme Court we will finally win our case and receive Justice?

Rosemary

 

Thread: Two Recently Won Cases against banks at the Supreme Court by CostaLuz Lawyers and DeCastro teams

--------------------------------------

28 Mar 2016 3:32 PM:

As we cannot post to your blog Maria perhaps you could clarify what this means to those awaiting Court cases regarding Ley 57/68 on this thread.

Thread: Congratulations to Costaluz Lawyers

--------------------------------------

26 Mar 2016 9:51 AM:

LEY 57/1968 WON CASE in SUPREME COURT AGAINST CAJA INSULAR DE AHORROS DE CANARIAS (now BANKIA) FOR OUR CLIENTS WHO PURCHASED TWO OFF-PLAN PROPERTIES FROM THE DEVELOPER CONSTRUCCIONES LUAYRA S.L. AT THE ‘EL SOBRAO’ DEVELOPMENT IN TRIQUIVIJATE, FUERTEVENTURA 
 

Congratulations and well done to Maria and The team at Costaluz Lawyers for their success with this Supreme Court Judgement. I have been unable to add a comment on the actual blog but just wanted to add my Congratulation. 'The Supreme Court has now fixed jurisprudential doctrine regarding Banks liabilities and obligations according to LEY 57/1968'. I believe this is a important step in the future Court cases involved in the Ley 57/68 and congratulate Costaluz Lawyers for their determination in making this happen. Am I right in thinking that another Judge has also to agree another case before this confirms the law?

Congratulation once again and good luck to your clients who have finally after all these years gained justice against the greedy developers and banks.

R and G
 

 

Thread: Congratulations to Costaluz Lawyers

--------------------------------------

10 Mar 2016 1:19 PM:

There seemed to be quite a lot of cases against the banks and developers using Let 57/68 in January and February of this year. Has anyone involved in these cases any further information to offer to help us understand the process more, i.e. Have the banks launched an appeal yet, have you launched an appeal, have you received any money yet. What are the Communications like with the Courts? Any information would be helpful. We go to Court in April and the prospects of years more going through appeals etc is daunting. We're just hoping that perhaps soon if the Banks stop appealing more will settle out of Court. R And G

Thread: Appeal cases

--------------------------------------