10 Jun 2015 5:55 PM:

Keith, is a Cassation Appeal the last resort? Also, will it prove costly? Thanks.

Thread: Court case against La Caixa / Trampolin Hills

--------------------------------------

10 Jun 2015 11:17 AM:

Lost the latest appeal as well. Crazy!

 

Is it really worth persuing yet another appeal, this time to the High Court, on the back of these set backs?

Could be costly!

 

 

 

 

This message was last edited by Joe1 on 10/06/2015.
Thread: Court case against La Caixa / Trampolin Hills

--------------------------------------

15 Mar 2015 4:48 PM:

My understanding is Ley 57/68 was essentially put into place to protect buyers against unscrupulous builders by protecting deposits. Banks are well aware of their role in this saga but still fight it through the courts. Ley 57/68 should be as clear as night and day but it isn't!

I have a question for Maria (mariadecastro), Guadalupe (gmlegal), or indeed anyone persuing recompence via Ley 57/58. Has anyone actually been refunded?

 

 

Thread: Bank Guarantee case won but still no refund

--------------------------------------

10 Mar 2014 7:45 PM:

I can't realy see the problem in missing one part of a return flight, people do it all the time!

If it puts your mind to rest, why not check in online for outward and return and then simply use the part you require. You have afterall paid for the right to travel and it's entirely up to you if you want to exercise that right.

Thread: What happens if I don't use a flight?

--------------------------------------

29 Aug 2013 10:42 AM:

 

 

This message was last edited by Joe1 on 10/03/2014.
Thread: Still Spot On

--------------------------------------