06 Oct 2015 6:09 PM:
Thanks to Maria for her post.
I''m not convinced Roberto, I think it just takes us back to the original question of whether a decision to skip properties where the owner is not resident can be enforced (quizzical face as I'm not able to insert a smiley)
Maria's number 69, says any owner can be voted in as President.
Number 70, says a President does not have to be resident the only requirement is to be an owner.
Then number 71, says If nobody puts themselves forward for the task then "A turn is then in place and the corresponding owner by said turn will be the president." there is no mention of being able to skip a property owner for any reason.
So one might interpret Maria's Q&A, which I read before my initial post, actually agree with the second part of the answer I received locally yesterday, that a Community cannot go against the HPA, which I've read many times over the last few years and as a retired accountant I can see ambiguities arising from so many angles.
In this case, I would read Maria's Q&A to be that IF next year the current president stands down and IF no owner puts themself forward for election THEN the only option available is to take the position to the next turn with no vote being required AND no legitimate reason to skip over to someone the meeting attendees prefer.
It just goes to show we can all read things differently and there are often two right answers :-)
Thread:
Limiting who can be in position of President
--------------------------------------