10 Feb 2016 2:20 PM:

Its just bollocks

Thread: Law 57/68 claims

--------------------------------------

06 Feb 2016 5:27 PM:

even if a small % of the original payments were given to another party, it seems crazy that because of this costs of 10s thousands of costs dont need to be awarded.

I thought if you won any case, you would get costs paid because of the positive outcome, it just doesn't make sense!

Thread: Law 57/68 claims

--------------------------------------

05 Feb 2016 11:43 AM:

it may be thats its just easier to take the costs from us instead of chasing the banks "again" for further payments owed.

 

Thread: Law 57/68 claims

--------------------------------------

04 Feb 2016 4:00 PM:

Hi guys

I did win my deposit back after years of courtroom dramas.

As to the costs, I paid a small retainer which was great.

However after the event, I lost my claim for costs which I couldn't appeal. The upshot being I paid all awarded interest (12k euro) in costs.

I have seen since that most people do get the costs back from the banks.

It just goes to show even though all the cases are pretty much the same , the outcomes can be different.

V Frustrating

cheers

Thread: Law 57/68 claims

--------------------------------------

27 Mar 2015 5:31 PM:

Hi Maria

I'm not sure what this means.

We are due some interest/costs from the banks after receicing our deposits back after winning our case.

Does this relate to this situation

Regards

Thread: SPANISH JUDGE DOES GOOD WORK ON ABUSIVE DELAY INTEREST CLAUSES

--------------------------------------