Isn't it great to see how a single article can have so many different interpretations depending on ones own personal interest or belief. The real answer is nobody in authority, so far, has catergorically stated that either everything is ok or that Corvera just wont open and be another airport growing weeds.
If I may comment on a couple of the points raised by inspectarhome.
He said that as work was still being carried out, then the airport will open. You can also say the same about San Javier as they are still. or were until recently, carrying out building works. An interesting question to ask oneself is...if it is 100% certain that Corvera will open this year or next year why carry on spending money on San Javier?
I am not by any stretch of the imagination an expert on airports but inspectahome said that the runway at Corvera was longer than both San Javier and Alicante which I do not doubt him. However how much longer than the existing runways do these massive inter-continental planes need?
The original concept of Corvera was a PRIVATE venture which, as usual in Spain, could not either raise enough capital or interest so let the Government take over and let the investors get their money back. A no risk option so long as the airport does not open.
Another orininal concept was that Corvera would be IN ADDITION to San Javier! WHY? San Javier is not or likely to be in the forseeable future at capicity so where was all this NEW custom going to come from? At that time Paramount was not even an idea in anyones mind. The concept of attracting passengers to a region renowned for its beaches to take away the airport nearest the beaches/hotels/houses and move it 30 minutes inland beggars belief.
Apart from the vested interests, when the bubble here burst two or three years ago, why waste everybodys money in constructing a new airport when there was an adequate one only a stones throw away?
I have as yet not been to Corvera but I expect that they will be using the infamous airbridges. If this is the case it is unlikely that our old f(r)iend Michael O'leary will contemplate using it. If this is correct then bang goes about 50% of their projected clientelle. That sounds good business sense to me!!!
However as stated before I am only postulating and only time will tell who is right and who is wrong.
Carry on with the discussion and your own personal opinions