I suspect that promotors who fail to do their own due diligence in this regard and fail to protect clients from cowboy builders will soon lose credibility as their activities that place clients at risk in this way are exposed. Promotors have culpability in this equation and should play their part in regulating the real estate industry by refusing to do business with those who continue to place clients at risk.
As with most effective regulatory controls it requires transparent reporting and monitoring mechanisms with effective power to enforce penalties/disincentives, however. This appears to be a common problem in Spain where agents, conveyancing lawyers / notaries, Banks, all continue to fail to adequately regulate their own professions, thereby providing a mechanism to restore faith (and sustainable growth) in an industry that has been sadly riddled with corrupt practice.
To depend upon others for due diligence or failure to regulate and stamp out bad practice from within is a deriliction of duty is it not?
Just a few thoughts!
ps Our postings crossed Mariedav so its good to hear of some positive news but it still begs the question why there is little recognition to effectively cleanse the industry from within instead of depending on those so badly affected to drive the clean-up process (after the event so to speak)!
This message was last edited by ads on 20/06/2015.
This message was last edited by ads on 20/06/2015.