03 Jan 2016 7:21 PM:

Good luck, and good legal advice...

Happy New Year to all of you ;)

Thread: NEW!!! - GREAT NEWS!!!! - SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS BANK LIABILITY FOR DEPOSITS UNDER LAW 57/1968

--------------------------------------

06 Dec 2015 8:51 AM:

Dear PattySmyth,

Unfortunately there are different interpretations when it comes to interest due to clients, as some Courts award full interest since amounts were paid into the banks, some others only award interest since the case was filed in Court, and others since the bank was asked to pay (before taking it to Court).

We will probably be taking this specific point to the Supreme Court soon, trying to obatin a general ruling for everyone, as we think that clearly Law 57/1968 includes rewarding full interest since amounts were paid by clients, as this is the way to "compensate" not having had that money for so many years.

As an example, we have more than 40 identical cases in the Courts of Alicante where we claim back deposits paid by our clients into different banks. In some of these cases, the Judge awards full interest from day one, and some others only since the case was filed.

Best,

Thread: NEW!!! - GREAT NEWS!!!! - SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS BANK LIABILITY FOR DEPOSITS UNDER LAW 57/1968

--------------------------------------

06 Dec 2015 8:03 AM:

Dear Mark,

After reading your posts all I can do is offer our help. We would be pleased to have a look at your case and give you some advice. So far we have had 100% success in our cases suing banks for deposit recovery and many cases still going. We also offer "no win no fee" schemes.

I will pm yo.

Regards,

Thread: Fortuna Golf Deposit Return

--------------------------------------

21 Mar 2011 10:12 AM:

Dear Mark and Janet,

It will depend on Maria's opinion. Surely she has pointed you in the right direction, as no reputable lawyer will like to fight a case that is lost from the beggining.

There is a risk in every case, but if you don't fight for what is yourse, who will do it?

Good luck and good Justice.

Thread: spanish lawyers

--------------------------------------

04 Oct 2010 11:40 PM:

Dear Faro, In Spain, the Law that regulates the companies (SLs or SAs) specifically refers to the responsability for the debts of the companies to be that of its administrators (personally liable) in some circumstances, which include abandoning the company, not filing bankruptcy proceedings when necessary or not complying with the Mercantile Registry obligations (such as filing annual accounts, etc). The procedure is not particularly complex, provided that there are legal grounds to go for the personal liability of the company administrators. Lifting the veil or fraudulent trading (which you mention in your post) refer to criminal responsibility of the administrators and what I am talking about is not criminal charges, but civil responsibility (economic at the end of the day). Kind regards

Thread: Enforcing a 10 year building guarentee ?

--------------------------------------