All EOS blogs All Spain blogs  Start your own blog Start your own blog 

El blog de Maria

Your daily Spanish Law reporter. Have it with a cafe con leche. www.costaluzlawyers.es

Legal tip 1078. Law 57/68 explained
Thursday, December 5, 2013 @ 5:01 PM

A very good explanation of Law 57/68 by Keith Rule.

LEY 57/1968 - AN EXPLANATION

LEY 57/1968 is a short but very important Law which was implemented in the Public Interest on
27 July 1968 specifically to safeguard purchasers deposits paid in good faith to developers
for off-plan properties.

The preamble of the Law explains clearly the reasons for its implementation.

The preamble states that there was justified public alarm at the fact that repeated abuses had been taking place
with regards to off-plan deposits.  It says the abuses which were obvious criminal acts had a serious
disruption of social life, constituted a serious alteration of the social coexistence and caused irreparable
damage to trust and good faith.  It says LEY 57/68 was being introduced in the Public Interest to create
general preventative standards to ensure the real and effective protection of funds paid in advance by
purchasers and to ensure they received a refund in the event that the house building did not take effect.

It appears that 40 years after LEY 57/68 was implemented we are experiencing the same 'repeated abuses'
and 'obvious criminal acts'  We now have the exact same situation of a 'serious disruption of social life' which
unfortunately for many innocent purchasers has again caused 'irreparable damage to trust and good faith'.
This is a serious public order matter that the Spanish Authorities must tackle immediately.

As you can see below the LEY 57/68 is very clear and provides absolute protection for the purchaser.
It is not LEY 57/68 that has failed.  The failure is that of the authorities whose duty it was to
uphold the rule of Law. 

LEY 57/1968 Article 1 states that any developer or promotor of homes that are designed
as a permanent or seasonal residence and who accepts purchasers deposit funds before
starting or during construction must meet the following conditions:

Article 1.1
Must issue at no cost to the Purchaser a Bank Guarantee or a Certificate of Insurance for ALL deposit payments
plus legal interest.  The Bank Guarantee or Certificate of Insurance may be executed by the
purchaser if the construction does not commence or complete for any reason by the agreed deadline.
The buyer is then entitled to a full refund of their deposit together with the addition of legal interest.
The rate of legal interest mentioned in LEY 57/68 is 6% per annum.  However, The Building Act LEY 38/99
amends this percentage to the legal rate as published annually in the 
Boletín Oficial del Estado.
The interest is calculated on a simple annual basis and is not compounded.  If the developer mentions in the
purchase contract that the interest payable is 6% per annum as stated originally in LEY 57/68 then this
will overrule the legal interest rate, providing the legal interest rate is lower than 6%.
The interest is calculated from the date of the deposit payment until such time as the refund is made.


Article 1.2
Must receive the funds paid in advance by purchasers through a Bank or Savings Bank and deposit in a
Special Account held at a Bank or Savings Bank.
The Special Account must be separate from any other account held by the developer or promotor and the
Special Account must only contain funds deposited for the construction of dwellings.
It is the responsibility of the Bank or Savings Bank to ensure that the Special Account is
opened and the Bank or Savings Bank must either issue the Bank Guarantee referred to in
Article 1.1 themselves, demand that the Bank Guarantee is issued or verify the existence of a
Bank Guarantee or Certificate of Insurance to fully cover the off-plan deposit funds in their custody.

Article 2
The Contract or Sales Agreement for which the developer or promotor receives
advance payments must state:
a) That the promotor or developer must refund the full deposit with the addition of legal interest
if the construction does not commence or if the construction is not completed by the date
stated in the contract.  The full deposit with the addition of legal interest must also be refunded
to the purchaser if the Certificate of Habitability (Licence of First Occupation) is not granted by
the Local Town Hall.

b) The contract must make reference to the Bank Guarantee or Certificate of Insurance and
it must name the Bank and/or Guarantor.

c) The contract must give the name of the Bank or Savings Bank who will hold the deposit
funds and it must give details of the Special Account where the funds will be held.

Immediately after receiving the deposit funds and at time the contract is issued the developer or
promotor MUST provide the purchaser with the Bank Guarantee or Certificate of Insurance
which must cover ALL amounts paid towards the price of the property.

Article 3
If the construction and delivery of the property has not been completed by the date set in the
contract then the buyer may chose between cancelling the contract and having the full
deposit refunded together with the addition of legal interest or have an annex to the contract
drawn up giving the developer or promotor extended time to complete the property.

Article 4
The Bank Guarantee or Certificate of Insurance must not have an expiry date.  It only expires when the
Certificate of Habitability (Licence of First Occupation) is issued by the Local Town Hall.

Article 5
Any sales and promotional material issued by the developer or promotor, which makes reference to
the payment of funds in advance for a property, must name the
entity who will issue the Bank Guarantee or Certificate of Insurance and must give details
of the Bank or Savings Bank Special Account in which the deposit funds will be held.

Article 6
This article gives details of the punishments and fines that will be imposed on the developer
or promotor if they fail to comply with the provisions of this Law.  As detailed in the Building Act
LEY 38/99 the fines imposed for each violation can be up to 25% of the deposit amount which
should have been protected.

Article 7
This article states that the rights this Law gives to the purchaser have a 'Caracter de Irrenunciables',
which translates to 'Inalienable Character'.
In this context inalienable means: Unchallengeable, Absolute, Immutable,
Not Able to be Forfeited, Unassailable, Incontrovertible, Indisputable, Undeniable.
This article also states that the purchasers rights granted by this Law are so strong that they cannot be
waived even at the request of the Purchaser.

The Building Act 1999 - LEY 38/1999, de 5 de noviembre, de Ordenación de la Edificación
As mentioned in the above paragraph titled Article 1.1, the Building Act 1999 - LEY 38/1999 in the First
Additional Provision amended the rate of interest payable on a Bank Guarantee refund to the legal interest rate instead of a fixed 6%.

As mentioned in the above paragraph titled Article 6, LEY 38/1999 also confirmed that fines imposed on
developers for breaching the requirements of LEY 57/1968 can be up to 25% of the deposit amount
which should have been protected.

In addition LEY 38/1999 also states:

That the requirements of LEY 57/1968 will apply to the promotion of all types of homes, including those
purchased by a community of owners or a housing co-operative.

The protection provided by LEY 57/1968 is also extended to amounts paid in cash to the developer which
must be deposited in the Special Account (Cuenta Especial).

Legal advice

Sunrise in the Strait, Tarifa, Cadiz, Southwestern Spain, at facebook.com

 

 


Like 0




3 Comments


david dorrell said:
Friday, December 6, 2013 @ 12:23 PM

As a client involved in the problems at Los Lagos I read with interest this report. However, to my mind, the initial and most serious negligence is with the LAWYERS that allow deposits to be paid over WITHOUT the Bank Guarantee.
There must surely be a simple solution that deposits are held in ESCROW accounts pending B.G. and released upon its issue, and THEN the contract becomes legal.
If that is not possible then say a 7 day period whereby if in default then monies are returned and the contract is null and void.
Reading Article 2 , The last paragraph [ Article 2 ] refers to the issue of the BG AFTER receipt of funds but AT THE TIME OF THE CONTRACT.
So many of the problems arise from the non-issue and non-compliance with the regulations/ laws.
The clients depend on LAWYERS to monitor and be responsible for the disregard of the laws. We pay them a substantial fee for this service and should expect their best vigilance.
Nobody seems to have the power or willingness to fight for the client against the negligent lawyers.

David Dorrell



mariadecastro said:
Friday, December 6, 2013 @ 3:12 PM

David:
Fully agree with you.
Our strategy is to go against Banks in clear cases and against legal representatives in those cases where Bank liability is not easy to be proved.
Cheers
Maria


Keith110 said:
Friday, December 6, 2013 @ 3:50 PM

David

Here is an article I wrote in August 2010 and published on my Bank Guarantees website: www.bankguaranteesinspain.com Kind regards, Keith.

THE SHOCKING TRUTH

LEY 57/1968 provides absolute protection for Purchaser funds paid to the Promoter in advance for a property. The rights granted to the purchaser under LEY 57/68 are of a 'Caracter de Irrenunciables' (Inalienable Character) and are INDISPUTABLE.

However many persons and companies associated with the Real Estate and Construction Industry in Spain failed to comply with the requirements of LEY 57/68.

Some Promotors / Developers failed to comply with any or most of the requirements of LEY 57/68.

Some Banks and Savings Banks are guilty of Gross Negligence and acted with a complete lack of professional due diligence. It must be remembered that these Banks and Savings Banks
are supervised by the Banco de Espana and many also carry out their business in other countries including the UK.

Some Lawyers who were being paid by the Purchasers and had a legal duty to act in the Purchasers best interests failed to carry out the relevant checks to ensure their clients funds were protected at all times in accordance with LEY 57/68.

Some Estate Agents failed to carry out any checks on the Promotor or Developer prior to marketing the developments. Many also continued to advertise properties on developments where they knew the developer and funding bank were failing to comply with the requirements of LEY 57/68.

Some Estate Agents continued to entice purchasers by stating in their promotional material 'BANK GUARANTEES INCLUDED' when they knew that many of the clients they had already sold to on the exact same development had not received the legally required Bank Guarantees.

This is a shocking situation and many thousands of innocent purchasers are at risk of losing their hard earned money due to the negligence and greed of some Promotors, Banks, Lawyers and Estate Agents.

The Banks & Savings Banks were the 'vehicle' through which the illegal activity operated.

The Banks & Savings Banks who were funding the developers were happy to use purchasers 'unsecured deposit funds' to lessen the Banks exposure to the various developments.

The fundamental problem is that the Spanish authorities failed to ensure compliance with LEY 57/68. For years developers, banks, agents and lawyers have been allowed to ignore the requirements of LEY 57/68.

Many of the lawyers and agents received much of their business from the developers and banks, therefore it was not in their interest to attempt to stop the illegal activity because by doing so they would be 'biting the hand that feeds'.

Many thousands of innocent purchasers have been robbed by the corrupt developers and negligent banks, lawyers and estate agents.

The Banco de Espana has also failed to regulate and monitor the activity of the Banks & Savings Banks with regards to accepting off-plan deposits.

The Spanish legal system has failed to uphold the INALIENABLE RIGHTS granted to the purchaser under LEY 57/68.

The Spanish Government must also be held accountable due to the fact that for years they have ignored this problem and have failed to take the appropriate action.

The Banks, Savings Banks, Banco de Espana and the Spanish Government must collectively accept responsibility and must act immediately to ensure that by whichever means all
purchasers who were not provided with the legally required Bank Guarantees receive a FULL refund of their deposit together with the addition of legal interest.

The Spanish Government together with the Banco de Espana must ensure that all those persons and entities who failed to comply with the requirements of LEY 57/68 and all those who were complicit in the illegalities committed are punished accordingly.

Legal action is now being taken by many purchasers under LEY 57/68 Article 1.2 and justice must be done in these cases if Spain wishes to go some way to repairing its badly damaged reputation in relation to the Real Estate and Construction Industry.





Only registered users can comment on this blog post. Please Sign In or Register now.




 

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x