All EOS blogs All Spain blogs  Start your own blog Start your own blog 

El blog de Maria

Your daily Spanish Law reporter. Have it with a cafe con leche. www.costaluzlawyers.es

Legal tip 477. Contract reciprocity
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 6:01 PM

Yes, that is what, according to European Directives and National legislation on Consumers Law,  adhesion or boilerplate contracts drafted by  developers companies need to keep  ( among other features)  for the protection of consumers.

This is exactly what this good Judge in Murcia ( see post dated the 7th of December below) applied, when he integrated the abusive clause which established a 100% penalty  when the buyer breaches the contract. 

If the buyer gets legal interests ( out of law 57/68)  when the developer breaches the contract,  being this 4% or 5% the vendor should have, no more, no less, rights for an equivalent amount.

It is very simple

Maria                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Legal tip 409. Good for Murcia Appeals Court in favour of consumers! 
07 December 2010 @ 16:35 

 

Another good new today, a Court decission by Murcia Appeal Court by which it is established ( this has Case Law value), in accordance with other jurisdictions in Spain, that penalty clauses when consumers do not complete on off plan purchase contracts can be just of legal interests level ( 4-5% of amounts paid) 

 

This.... against what many contracts in the Murcia area established : loss of the total amounts paid by consumer to developer.

 

Again in application of Consumer Law and good faith and balance contract principles.

 

Again... another proof of a healthy legal system :)

 

Cheers!

Maria

Tarifa, Cadiz, Costa de la Luz, By Von Boot at Flickr.com



Like 0




5 Comments


Chrissie1 said:
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 10:59 PM

Maria

I cannot under any circumstances agree with you that Spain has a healthy legal system. It is corrupt at every single level.

Sorry Chrissie1


Maria said:
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 8:37 AM

Chrissie:

I could put myself on the shoes os those waiting for Justice and think on corruption as the casuse of their nightmares, but I would not go to the core of the problem which is, as in other many areas, lack of competitiveness, proffessionalism, auto-revision... Of course the financial crisis has also made an important impact of slowness of Justice these years. But the basis are strong, and the legal order is coherent.


Anne said:
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 10:28 AM

It is very simple to see that under the present system in Spain the real wrongdoer (developer) long since departs the scene before recompense is awarded and so long as this is allowed to continue through abusive delays, then there will be no fair justice in Spain.
Also these "games" re slowness of justice were being played out well before the onset of the financial crisis and all too many clients sadly have cases dating back many years.
By all means have a level playing field, but look to the true facts behind these judgements and you will see that a strong and coherent legal order is of no benefit to the final outcome.
A disgrace.



Chrissie1 said:
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 10:00 PM

Maria

A Law is set up to originally maintain regularity of natural occurances. Law 57/68 was set up when such occurances/abuses were already occuring. Why do I now find myself in 2011 fighting what is supposed to be protecting me. No this is not healthy and you should be ashamed of such an uncivilised systematic abuse of decent, ordinary hard working people whose only fault was to believe that when we handed our money over we would be given what we had paid for. We are now faced with taking the Bank to court because it will not honour Law 57/68.

Once again your justice system is not healthy. It's Utterly disgraceful and you know it.

Chrissie1

Chrissie1


Chrissie1 said:
Monday, March 21, 2011 @ 8:07 PM

Please also take into account that Law 57/68 was made in July 1968 some 40 years ago. There is no excuse for theft on such a scale. The economic climate has nothing to do with the delay.

Not healthy which ever way you look at it is it? More
like grand theft.

Chrissie1




Only registered users can comment on this blog post. Please Sign In or Register now.




 

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x