Horizontal Property Act, Section 17
The Comments |
section 17 of the horizontal property act reads:-
The establishment or elimination of the lift, janitor and security services, or other common services or
facilities of general interest, even where they involve the modification of the master deed or the
community statutes shall require the favourable vote of three fifths of the total number of unit owners
representing three fifths of the assessment quotas. The lease of common elements lacking a specific use
shall require the favourable vote of three fifths of the total of unit owners representing three fifths of the
assessment quotas as well as the consent of the unit owner directly affected, if this were the case.
In this particular case does the voting exclude owners who are overdue with their community fees, or does this section of the act enable all owners to vote regardless of their debts?
0
Like
|
If an owner is in arrears, they cannot vote until the arrears are paid.
_______________________
' Do unto others as you would be done by'
Now a non-smoker !
0
Like
|
I appreciate that in normal circumstances & for voting on everyday matters only fully paid up owners may vote. However for large capital expenditures covered in section 17 I have been told that all owners have a vote.
This is very important as our agm is tomorrow and a lot may depend on this. Even our administrator has given two opinions!
This message was last edited by willow on 24/09/2009.
0
Like
|
Only in the case of unanimity established in section 17 (1) some courts don’t admit deprivation of voting rights of owners in default
_______________________ www.fljordan.com
0
Like
|
Hi,
Please could anyone tell me if an owner of several apartments in one complex is able to have a vote for each apartment they own.
If they are allowed to make one vote for each apartment they own, do they have to be fully paid of all community fees to be able to vote.,
If they they own several apartments in one complex and 6 have outstanding fees, can they vote have 4 votes on the 4 community fees that are fully paid.
Many Thanks in advance for any answers or advice given, I have been through the Spanish Horizontal Law and have found no answers.
Doedoe
_______________________ DoeDoe
0
Like
|
The owner with several flats in the same community only has one vote.
However each owner vote is not the same. Each owner votes with the amount of cuota the properties have.
So if there were 100 flats which all have a 1% cuota, the owner with 5 apartments would have a vote worth 5 times as much as the owners with only 1 apartment.
Now I have not seen the other questions that you've asked written down anywhere but the HPA seems very logical.
On that "logical" assumption if someone has 10 properties of which 6 are in arrears and 4 are up to date, you should be able to vote with the cuota of the 4 you have paid the fees on. You can settle the fees as late as the beginning of the meeting.
This message was last edited by worried owner on 20/04/2010.
0
Like
|
Yes, vote is for every apartment he owns adn whose community quotas are paid.
This message was last edited by mariadecastro on 21/04/2010.
_______________________
Maria L. de Castro, JD, MA
Lawyer
Director www.costaluzlawyers.es
0
Like
|
Number of posts in this thread:
7
DISCLAIMER: All opinions posted on these message boards are the opinion solely
of the poster and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Eye on Spain, its servants
or agents.
1 |