A few days ago, Andrew Linn of Culture Spain’s wine and food Blog sent me an intriguing link concerning the Spanish property crisis – albeit that it pertains to the US.
An answer to the property crisis in the US, it seems, is to demolish the over-supply of housing stock (as you can see from this article) which some large companies in the US are starting to do. The question is: could this be the way forward for Spain and a way of mitigating the current Spanish property crisis?
I presume, of course, that the reasoning behind demolishing excess housing stock is to reduce the over-supply and thereby prop up housing prices.
Frankly, the idea horrifies me!
Indeed, there seems something quite immoral about destroying perfectly good properties (if that is what is suggested) when there are homeless people around. Rather than demolish them why not give them away to the homeless or at least to homeless people who can show that they can afford to maintain the running costs of the properties concerned. This could be done by raffle or by application and would provide much better PR for the companies concerned than destroying sound property (surely?) and would not impact one way or another on property prices if it was done carefully.
I am curious as to what everyone thinks?
Perhaps in Spain there is an argument for demolishing all illegally built housing? That may make better sense and alleviate a perennial problem of property in Spain. Certainly, property illegality in Spain is endemic and does nothing for the reputation of Spain as somewhere safe to buy (not helped by the generally poor standard of legal practice when it comes to the conveyancing of Spanish properties).
There are also, perhaps, arguments for demolishing some of the worst and most hopeless property developments in Spain. However, I suspect, that would be a difficult matter to put into practice given the subjectivity of ‘worst’ – worst looking, worst build quality, worst design etc. Meanwhile, what is a ‘hopeless’ development? I think we all have some pretty good candidates but someone must have thought that they were worthwhile before investing in their construction.
Well, I am not so sure about my last argument – as most of the financing of building projects in Spain was undertaken by the banks and many of their judgements (dare we use that word about their decisions?) were nothing if not ill-considered.
What do you think – is demolishing surplus housing stock in Spain a good idea? Do you have some candidates for demolition or do you think the whole idea is absurd and that it is no solution to the Spanish property crisis?
If you were our esteemed Presidente (Zapatero) what would you be doing in Spain now – to correct the housing crisis?