Legal tip 277. Low cost action against Banks. Manifesto by Costaluzlawyers

Expatica - Health
Post reply   Start new thread
New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 |

Trampolin Hills forum threads
The Comments
31 Aug 2010 12:00 AM by mariadecastro Star rating in Algeciras (Cadiz). 9419 forum posts Send private message

mariadecastro´s avatar

 

This message is brought to you by Costa Luz Lawyers in association with Eye on Spain

Because we see this is what is needed in the most of the cases were people bought off plan and did not receive a Bank Guarantee,

 

 

Because claimers are frustrated and tired of waiting for years for actually receiving the refund of their money after a Court Decission being won in Courts, due to poor financial status of developers now,

 

 

 

 

 Because it is a great tool to try to put some correction to the financial system in off plan purchases for the protection of buyers so we can be sure these current problems will not happen again in our country,

 

 

 

 

Because we need to show to foreigners that Spain has a strong and coherent legal system,

 

 

 

 

 Because we can offer low cost action to groups of people under the rules of our professional ethical code,

 

 

 

 

 Because Banks lack of control of Guarantees on deposits by individual people of off-plan purchases have been the necessary element without which the current off-plan disaster in Spain would have never happened,

 

 

 

 

 Because Law 57/68 makes them clearly liable for the lack of Bank Guarantees,

 

 

 

 

 Because we have been studying this action for months with the help of a first class Law Professor who is available to answer questions in Court regarding the report he produced for us,

 

 

 

 

 Because it is necessary, mainly because you need it

 

 

 

 

 We are offering to all the EOS members the possibility of joining existing actions against Banks under provision 1.2 of Law 57/68 at a much reduced cost.

 

 

 

 

Main ground of Law 57/68 is the protection of money advanced by individuals before construction work begins or during it, in many cases the savings of a lifetime.

 

 

 

 

The actual preamble or “exposición de motivos” of the said Law establishes that all the "abuses in this type of businesses have made as necessary the establishment of general preventive rules which will guarantee both the real and effective application of money advanced by purchasers and prospective customers to the building of the house and to the refund in the event that the building does not take effect".

 

 

 

 

The most preventive, general, inalienable obligation that this Law established was for banks or savings banks, where money was paid to by buyers, to secure the establishment of Bank Guarantees or insurances policies, UNDER THEIR LIABILITY. Banks were therefore here established as guardians of Law 57/68 with express obligations of:

 

 

 

 

1)    Place those deposits in special accounts

 

2)    Control the destination of funds to building works

3)    Verify on the existence of the Guarantees required by Law 57/68

 

 

Please contact us here: web@costaluzlawyers.es if you want further information about this.

 

Have a great week,

Maria L. de Castro

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because we see this is what is needed in the most of the cases were people bought off plan and did not receive a Bank Guarantee,

 

 

 

Because claimers are frustrated and tired of waiting for years for actually receiving the refund of their money after a Court Decission being won in Courts, due to poor financial status of developers now,

 

 

 

 

 Because it is a great tool to try to put some correction to the financial system in off plan purchases for the protection of buyers so we can be sure these current problems will not happen again in our country,

 

 

 

 

Because we need to show to foreigners that Spain has a strong and coherent legal system,

 

 

 

 

 Because we can offer low cost action to groups of people under the rules of our professional ethical code,

 

 

 

 

 Because Banks lack of control of Guarantees on deposits by individual people of off-plan purchases have been the necessary element without which the current off-plan disaster in Spain would have never happened,

 

 

 

 

 Because Law 57/68 makes them clearly liable for the lack of Bank Guarantees,

 

 

 

 

 Because we have been studying this action for months with the help of a first class Law Professor who is available to answer questions in Court regarding the report he produced for us,

 

 

 

 

 Because it is necessary, mainly because you need it

 

 

 

 

 We are offering to all the EOS members the possibility of joining existing actions against Banks under provision 1.2 of Law 57/68 at a much reduced cost.

 

 

 

 

Main ground of Law 57/68 is the protection of money advanced by individuals before construction work begins or during it, in many cases the savings of a lifetime.

 

 

 

 

The actual preamble or “exposición de motivos” of the said Law establishes that all the "abuses in this type of businesses have made as necessary the establishment of general preventive rules which will guarantee both the real and effective application of money advanced by purchasers and prospective customers to the building of the house and to the refund in the event that the building does not take effect".

 

 

 

 

The most preventive, general, inalienable obligation that this Law established was for banks or savings banks, where money was paid to by buyers, to secure the establishment of Bank Guarantees or insurances policies, UNDER THEIR LIABILITY. Banks were therefore here established as guardians of Law 57/68 with express obligations of:

 

 

 

 

1)    Place those deposits in special accounts

 

2)    Control the destination of funds to building works

3)    Verify on the existence of the Guarantees required by Law 57/68

 

 

Please contact us here: web@costaluzlawyers.es if you want further information about this.

 

 

Have a great week,

Maria L. de Castro

 

"The port of Tarifa (Cadiz)", by Luis Lopez-Cortijo

 

 

 

 

 

 



_______________________

Maria L. de Castro, JD, MA

Lawyer

Director www.costaluzlawyers.es

El blog de Maria


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

01 Nov 2010 2:07 PM by elliottmatthews Star rating. 2 forum posts Send private message

I have joined your action in November 2009 - as so far you have not registered my action.

i have a huge number of emailfrom your company where you ask questions but do not listen to the answers wait 2 months and then ask the questions again.

I have been give Mr Stephen Schaffer and Patricia Medena as contacts from your comapny but noone wishes to reply to my emails or phone calls.

I find this extemely dissapointing at this service esp. as they were recommended or look as though they are endorsed by Eye on Spain.

This is a really frustrating situation esp. after losing so much money on my flats, now to have such a frustration with the lawyers is really just too much to bare.

Please help.

Kind Regards

Elliott Matthews




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

Pages: 1 |
Post reply   Start new thread


Previous Threads

Trampolin Hills ordered to refund and compensate buyer whose house was not built - 0 posts
BANK GUARANTEES PETITION IMPORTANT PLEASE FILL IN THE ONLINE FORM - 4 posts
Rafas Out - 4 posts
A recent sentence opens the door for buyers to claim liability to Banks - 7 posts
For sale bits & pieces - 0 posts
president of grupo trampolin arrested - 1 posts
important succes of one of the buyers - platform and new legal actions - 1 posts
Legal action against Campos del Rio Town Hall - 4 posts
confusing; associations, platforms and cooperatives - 5 posts
PLATAFORMA ACREEDORES TRAMPOLIN (MONEY BACK / OBTAIN THE LAND) - 0 posts
Registering as a creditor in the Trampolin Hills administration debacle! - 14 posts
Where has the money gone - 36 posts
We should plan to involve the Spanish Government and/or EU - 16 posts
ALL OR NOTHING NOW - 10 posts
BUYERS FOR THE BUILDING OF TRAMPOLIN HILLS - 19 posts
DEADLINE DECEMBER 2nd to apply to courts - 1 posts
GM LEGAL EXPERTS - 3 posts
EVERYTHING YOU NEEDTO KNOW ABOUT THE SITUATION WITH GRUPO TRAMPOLIN - 8 posts
ANY FURTHER INFO - 1 posts
We don't know where to start with our problems regarding Trampolin Hills can anyone answer any of our questions - 2 posts
The informer - 5 posts
Trampolin Hills promoters ordered to pay €30 million bail - 4 posts
GT went down the drain - OK, but who will finalize the project? - 9 posts
Trampolin Hills in Bankruptcy Protection - article in today's Laverdad - 23 posts
Sorry to be the bearer of "Bad News" - 1 posts

2 posts were found:


1 |
Our Weekly Email Digest
Name:
Email:


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x