Refunded

Hi All

After a long battle with the Caxia bank dating back to 2009 we have recived all monies owed to us and are happy with this outcome for us. Only down side is we had to pay our costs as no cost where adwarded to us or the bank at first hearing at court. We did appeal but frist hearing up held the decision.. As our case escallated to the Supreme Court - no costs are awarded to either party so we had to pay our lawyers an agreed fee.

We hope this may be positive news for some of yous still going through the process. .

Thanks to our solicitors - Imont legal.

Linda and Tom

So you didn't gain return of Supreme Court costs as well as first instance costs? Or perhaps we've misunderstood?

Presumably you did gain interest correctly backdated to date of deposit but were these in effect significantly compromised by the unrecoverable costs?

Why would the SC not find in favour of yourselves re award of costs to act as true accountability with regard to the Banks wrong doings, and thereby act as disincentive for the Banks to continue their ploys to proliferate appeals ad infinitum and in so doing compromise the justice and court system going forward?

Was this ever explained to you by your legal team?