Consider the following and make your own judgements with regard to adherence to the rule of law in Spain:
Regulatory Enforcement
Public enforcement of government regulations is pervasive in modern societies as a method to induce conduct. A critical feature of the rule of law is that such rules are upheld and properly enforced by authorities, particularly because public enforcement might raise the scope for negligence and abuse by officials pursuing their own interest. Appropriate and effective enforcement does not only mean that it occurs without public or private meddling, but also that regulatory proceedings are conducted in a timely way that respects the due process of law.
It consists of 84 variables combined to form the following five sub-factors:
Subfactors
6.1 Government regulations are effectively enforced
6.2 Government regulations are applied and enforced without improper influence
6.3 Administrative proceedings are conducted without unreasonable delay
6.4 Due process is respected in administrative proceedings
6.5 The Government does not expropriate without adequate compensation
Adherence to Ley 57/68 in its entirety according to the above rule of law springs to mind here (where all to many have been compromised by failure of enforcement, inconsistent judicial interpretations etc), not to mention failures to compensate those affected by retrospective costa ley law changes, illegal demolitions,etc............
The EU identify that they cannot interfere due to current treaty arrangements and rely upon "moral authority" by individual member states. But the system fails when "moral authority" is lacking and a legal lottery exists.
Sad but true.
This message was last edited by ads on 19/05/2014.