Section 18 (2) of the HPA in regard of resolutions adopted in meetings establishes
Owners who recorded a dissenting vote at the meeting, those who were absent for any reason and those who were improperly deprived of their right to vote shall be entitled to challenge these resolutions. In order to challenge a resolution, an owner must have satisfied all commonhold levies or, alternatively, must have paid them into court before proceedings. This provision shall not apply to the challenging of resolutions relating to the alteration of owners’ allocations, as referred in section 9.
As far as I know your community is not dealing with resolutions relating to the alteration of owners’ quotas therefore in principle you must have satisfied all commonhold levies in order to challenge any resolution at court.
Nevertheless, section 15 (2) of the HPA provides for deprivation of voting rights:
Owners who at the time the meeting is called are not up-to-date with payments of outstanding community charges and have not judicially challenged them, or deposited the amount thereof in court, or with the notary public shall be allowed to take part in the debates but are not able to vote.
Technically you are debtor at the moment but in order to recover the outstanding fees the community needs in accordance with section 21 (2) prior certification of the Owners’ Committee decision approving the debt settlement due to the commonhold, issued by its secretary and with the approval of the president, providing said decision has been notified to the owners concerned in the form set out in section 9.
As section 15 (2) requires the previous challenge of the debt to avoid disenfranchisement you should challenge this debt settlement referred in section 21 (2). After that and without waiting the court’s judgement you will be entitled to vote again.
The problem is that you don’t have such settlement yet or do you?