The Comments |
Hi All,
The January 2011report and the accompanying additional documents are on the SARC website Newsletter page for all to be able to access and the SARC committee hope that they are of help to all. Please note the report is at the bottom of the reports list.
http://www.santaanadelmonte.org
All the best
Tony
This message was last edited by TonyMal on 12/02/2011. This message was last edited by TonyMal on 13/02/2011.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Has anyone read this ? If so what do you all think ? It doesn't seem to reflect what is happening on El Pinet not sure what to believe now
see below from the SARC report
El Pinet:
HdT are waiting for Judge to make the Official notification to creditors regarding the outcome of the vote (There is a period of 15 days after the closing of the vote in which queries about the vote can be made). When the Court releases the Official bulletin announcing that SJI are out of Administration, the actions in the Feasibility Report, for Year 1 can commence. Until then SJI remain under the supervision of the Administrators but they
estimate that by the 1st March 2011 SJI to be out of Administration
More than 300 families are currently living on El Pinet and the residents have water and electricity supplies on the builder’s supply
Almudena said that the electricity company has been paid to lay the cables and should be doing so within the next 2 – 3 months and this will help with the issuing of the habitation licences by the Elche Town Hall
. It was also stated that the current build is over 95% complete and that the final layer of tarmac applied after the surrounding building is complete. Almudena reported roads, street lighting etc almost complete and that the green areas would be finished.
The SARC members asked about the finance to complete the build at el Pinet and were informed that this should soon be signed with BBVA once SJI are officially out of administration and that the build would proceed in sectors. Some of the properties are very close to completion and will only take a short period of time to complete. SJI provided a plan of el Pinet indicating the sectors to be built and how many months it would take to complete them after the build on them had commenced.
Once the court announces that SJI are out of Administration the completion works for 135 Units in M1 commences and the properties in M11, M15 and M17 are near completion.
SJI are preparing a Questionnaire to be sent to creditors seeking an up to date position on the objectives of creditors i.e.: waiting 5years, pooling credits, seeking other assets etc.
SARC enquired as to the state of the swimming pools at el Pinet and the issue of ownership and guarantees.
SARC also enquired about comments seen on EOS el Pinet forum about the el Pinet community association "borrowing" several thousand Euros from SJI, resulting in a debt to SJI for the property owners
It was explained by Jose and Almudena that the pools had been handed over to the community and that they had guarantees for 3 or 5 years for various components. Jose mentioned that pools had been left empty or partially filled and this had caused problems with tiles. Anthony said that pools should not be left empty as this could cause structural problems and result in leaks. (This was knowledge gained from being the representative of his local open air pools user group). SJI said that they would look into seeing what they could do to help. . Almudena said that SJI had not lent any money to the community association but when SJI went into administration the administrators said that SJI should no longer pay for electricity and water at el Pinet and to stop the payments. SJI argued that this was not acceptable and payments were continued despite SJI not being liable and became a debt due to the community.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Hi Rason,
SARC have members at el Pinet and strangely none of them have made the remarks that you have. What is it that is causing you concern? I am sorry to mention it but I have also PM'd you and I am still awaiting a reply.
Wishing you all the best
Tony
This message was last edited by TonyMal on 21/02/2011.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
With all respect Tony , It is quite usual for those on the El Pinet forum to take a while to respond .They are pro -active and tend to contemplate reality as opposed to quickly reacting to the needs and whims of the developer.
Those on El Pinet tend not to be easily influenced or misguided by what they are told . In other words they think about the bigger picture before they speak or act .Which is a strategy you would do well to consider .
I am quite happy to wait a while for the considered opinion of those who have been dealing with the reality of this mess for years, rather than those who have no idea of what they are actually dealing with and think SJ are all great above board beyond reproach good guys .
As for your PM Tony I do not know who you are nor do I wish to .I have seen enough of your behaviour on this site to know that I do not want anything to do with you . So please do not PM me again .
This message was last edited by Rason on 22/02/2011.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Hi Rason,
I find your posting perplexing. If any one looks at the SADM thread they would see that I post politely and have been consistently so, depsite the rather rude and aggresive behaviour of some.
As for your comments about considered opinion, how many purchasers do you know of who formed a representative organistation, a website, attend meetings at the Town Hall with the Mayor, administrators and the company? It is a shame that rather than responding in a polite manner and having a reasonable and logical exchange you are distinctly negative.
I appreciate what an awfull time those of you at el Pinet have been through and still have not resolved. SARC does have members there. If we can do anything to help fellow purchasers from HdT's sister company we will do so.
I truly wish you all the best
Tony
I posted below the PMs that I sent you to ensure that all can see the nature of my communications to you and they can judge your response fro themselves
18/02/2011 20:07:00
TonyMal
Sent to:
Rason
|
Hi Rason,
I am sorry that you have an incorrect impresion of SARC and are propogating it further. SARC have taken massive abuse by several posters on EOS .SARC have representatives covering a wide range of points of view, including wanting properties or wanting their money back. The only thing that I have said is that it would be daft to place commercialy sensitive information in a public domain.
Further more I have fought and continue to fight for the right for any one to have and express their point of view but not to insult, deride, abuse or mislead others who post on the forum.
Wishing you all the best
Tony
|
21/02/2011 22:24:00
TonyMal
Sent to:
Rason
|
Hi Rason,
We also have contacts & members at el Pinet who strangley have not made any challenge concerning the report. For some reason they appear to understand it more clearly. Which bit is it that you believe is wrong?
KR
Tony
|
|
sorry for the lines my PC played up |
This message was last edited by TonyMal on 22/02/2011. This message was last edited by TonyMal on 22/02/2011.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Can I take it that all is well since my last visit three weeks ago " that the current build is over 95% complete " ! Really I had not noticed !!!!
" More than 300 families are currently living on El Pinet and the residents have water and electricity supplies on the builder’s supply " Really this is a misleading statement owners are paying sj's debt !!
does no one else see the rubbish in this so called report ?????
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Hi Tony
Thank you very much for posting information from the SARC website and this is very much appreciated. As this is a new "thread" I have only just become aware of it as nearly all the El Pinet postings/comments are put on the thread which has had 457 postings and for which I get email alerts whenever a new comment is made. I imagine therefore, that it's possible quite a few regular El Pinet bloggers haven't seen it either. Perhaps I should trawl for new threads more often but have become a bit used to the instant access from the email alerts. May I suggest that you post a link to this new thread on the widely used El Pinet thread? I would do so myself but maybe you have a reason for not wanting it put there. Thanks again for the info.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Rason,
If you'd read my reply to Tony you would see that I wasn't commenting on the Report's accuracy, just thanking Tony for posting that link. After all these years of false information/promises we're all quite capable of assessing for ourselves whether information posted is worth believing. I like to be kept informed on what is going on whether it's actual fact, someone's opinion or downright lies! Unfortunately, there have been too many broken promises over the years to believe what SJ say, but being ever opltimistic, I want to believe that they will be coming out of Administration sooner rather than later. Only time will tell whether my optimism is justified.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Hi Rason,
If you would kindly not spread untruths I would be most gratefull, as I nor any member of the SARC committee speak for HdT or SJI.
SARC are willing to take any queries from el Pinet residents to meetings and have a representative of el Pinet purchasers on the commitee. That would be much more construcitve rather than posting comments that are not true.
Wishing you all the best
Tony Chair SARC Committee
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
9palms said
" It looks a profesional web site and they call themselves a 'residence co-operative', which would sound a democratic setup to me? "
Libya and Gaddafi also have a professional looking web site and call themselves a peoples republic by your reasoning they are therefore democratic .This is the real world. I understand exactly what SARC are saying but that does not mean I believe it or am foolish enough to think SARC to be in anyway democratic .
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
well said victor
some may want to ignore the facts and points of law .I prefer to reflect on truth fact and past experience .The committee at El Pinet have signed there own fate and played straight int SJs hands . It is financial and legal suicide to join in their illegal blinkered little game . Those who have not occupied their properties on legal advise are now in a much better position than those who have resided illegally and rented illegally .The truth will out and come back to bite well before SJ ever come with a solution . SJ are side stepping the real issues and the committee's actions are giving credence to their illegal actions .
This message was last edited by Rason on 17/03/2011.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Well how smug ?! It must be nice to be in such a privileged position that you can afford to sit back not using or renting your 'legally' owned property. We were sold to under the false pretence that we could inhabit. Neither solicitors, local councils or notaries advised us otherwise. If we had known about certificates of habitacion we would never have completed. Easy to be wise after the event.
There are thousands of owners of all nationalities in these difficult circumstances all over Spain. Personally, we are retirees and can't afford to sit back and wait for things to take their course under the due process of Spanish law! We may never see this situation resolved, but in the meantime, we are going to try and enjoy our property and make the best of it, as life is too short for all this aggravation.
We are all the innocent victims here so why are you so dismissive of the efforts of others who try their best to find out the situation and report to us all on this forum? Your comments to anyone who has a different opinion to yours are very contemptuous.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
WELL. we have some interesting reactions.
Not smug at all. Find it condecending for someone to say I am contemptuous because I have a different opinion to them. Democratic......apparently we are back to Libya
I am entitled to have my own thoughts. ( nearly illegal in libya, china, spain, uk, el pinet committee, SEE WEB SITE) I am entitled to express those thought. You may wish to disagree with me, but that does not mean you are correct. You might disagree with me, your choice.
I don't dismiss the efforts of those trying to ' sort things out' but its lambs v lion. Explain 100 / 150 pm......why should I pay 100pm to maintain a pool? That is the MAIN community expense. You / me they are trying to screw us all.
This message was last edited by victor meldrew on 18/03/2011.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
What was actually meant was 'comments' made about others' opinions sound contemptuous. Everyone can voice their opinion as you and I have done, but in no way would I be offensive. The fact that opinions differ in some ways is healthy as we can all take from it and make our own conclusions.
We are not happy at the amount we have to pay in fees i.e. 100€uros for non residents, however, we do want to use our property so choose to do so.
This message was last edited by CeeJay on 18/03/2011.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|