Wanted: 3-month min let in Los Alcazares starting next week!

Expatica - Health
Post reply   Start new thread
New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 |

Jumilla Golf And Country Club forum threads
The Comments
15 May 2008 12:00 AM by Don Ross Star rating. 7 forum posts Send private message

We have started this thread incase some of our members have, for any reason, not received the email that was sent. We can only comment on the arrangements that we have made on behalf of our members and not on any arrangement made by other agents; although there may be some general information that will benefit them.
This is a verbatim copy of the mail that was sent to our members:
Dear (member's name)
You may have been made aware, through the press, media or internet, of reports concerning the finances of the Spanish property developer San Jose. As part of our ongoing service to members we have asked for, and been provided with, the full detail which I am now passing on to you.
So as to fully understand the current situation it is necessary to have some of the background. Firstly, it has to be said that San Jose is an extremely asset rich company. They have over 300 million euros worth of unencumbered assets; which in anyone’s book makes them a sound long term proposition. Secondly, there are two of their developments that have had issues, El Pinet and Santa Ana, and I will give you the background to both. Thirdly, they have acted in a professional way to protect the future of the company and, I have been assured by the directors of San Jose, that there will not be any knock-on effect to our members’ investments in terms of risk to, or delay in, meeting our completion dates.
San Jose bought land at El Pinet, which had been granted change of use from urbanistic to development, and started building on an approved plan for 700 properties. After the first 400 or so had been built the Green Party, who had come to power, objected and won a court case to have the land reclassified back to urbanistic use. San Jose appealed the ruling and after 18 months won the case to have the reclassification overturned. This caused a severe delay in completing the build and obtaining habitation licences for the properties already completed. The consequent interruption to cash flow was serious, however, as San Jose are a company with unencumbered assets in excess of 300 million euros it was no more than a trading difficulty.
At the same time the situation at Jumilla, which I described in detail in my last update, was developing. In essence the land which was agreed to be sold was held up by a couple of small holders and the court case took some time to resolve the issue. This again had an effect on San Jose’s ability to get started on the building at the Santa Ana development and was a further setback in terms of cash flow.
As I mentioned before San Jose are extremely asset rich, however, like every other business they need to raise working capital and therefore they sought to rearrange their finances to cover the loss of revenue from El Pinet so that the effect on the Jumilla project would be lessened. Initially their preferred bank agreed to a line of credit that would have seen them through the loss of revenue situation but a newly appointed director then vetoed the deal. This left San Jose in a position where they had to negotiate with other banks to provide the credit facility that they believed they had already secured.

To avoid the situation which they are now in, they had two months to arrange finances with other banks, however, this coincided with the credit crunch and subsequent lending clampdown that has affected all borrowers, business and private alike, and they were unable to negotiate a satisfactory arrangement within the allotted time. The lack of cash flow left them in a technically insolvent position despite their undoubted wealth of assets and so, being an extremely professional organisation, they have placed themselves in administration.
Administration differs from liquidation or receivership in that it is a process that is used to protect a company that can undoubtedly trade out of its difficulties; this is the case with San Jose.
 
At present they are satisfying those creditors who will take assets in place of revenue whilst negotiations continue with a group of banks, including Barclays International, to provide lines of credit to secure all other debts and see them through the next 2 years of trading; something in the order of 30 million euros.
 
These negotiations are at an advanced stage and being in administration will allow work to recommence at El Pinet in the next week or so, with work at Santa Ana Jumilla starting again as soon as possible after that.
 
In terms of what this all means to investors, San Jose is an extremely wealthy company that has gone into administration whilst they make arrangements to leverage their assets into working capital. This is a responsible move given the situation that they found themselves in.
 
Therefore all investors in these developments should remain calm whilst the administration process and bank negotiations run their course. Deposits that have been taken on properties on these developments are safeguarded by bank guarantees and indeed, there is no indication that the original plans and timescales will not be met and therefore a default situation is not likely to arise.
 
We will remain in close contact with San Jose during the next few weeks and, if there is any further information that will help to clarify the situation, I will give a further update. In the meantime please remember that the press and media love to whip up a story to gain maximum effect; we will continue to bring you the real situation as it develops.
 
Yours sincerely
 
 
Andrew Ward
Managing Director
Ward & Co Property Investments



Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 2:36 PM by FINCA2009 Star rating. 31 forum posts Send private message

don could you tell why when i spoke to your company in march you told me that this was the best investment and best capital growth potential over next 18mths, why you have taken off your website.

if you are so confident in their response to you.

plus directors assets likes homes etc making up much of 300 million euros in assets plus land owned by their various subsidiary companies cannot be reclaimed by buyers at santa ana.

as you know but have conveniently not advised is each san jose development is set up under seperate spanish sl, so as they did at albatera when the spanish sl shuts down the buyers have no recourse to the holding company

is your confidence due to the fact you are still waiting some commission


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 3:05 PM by Don Ross Star rating. 7 forum posts Send private message

The purpose of posting the email was to provide a source of information to our members who may, for some reason or another, not have received it.

The reason for taking down the Santa Ana information on our site was pure prudence, one of our corporate attributes that appeals to our member base. Whilst we have every faith in San Jose coming through this temporary situation, it seemed the obvious thing to do during the period of uncertainty before we had our meetings with their directors and lawyers.

Again I must state that I can only speak for our members who have bought their properties through us. Those who purchased through us have nothing to worry about. As soon as we have the full detail of the new financial arrangements, in a week or two, and have satisfied ourselves that we can continue to provide new investors with the same safeguards as we have secured for our current investors, then we will put the offer back on the site.

It is not my place to act as a mouthpiece for San Jose, or the courts, or indeed anyone other than our company and I cannot afford the time to be permanently online. I am happy however, to post new information as I find it.




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 3:19 PM by FINCA2009 Star rating. 31 forum posts Send private message

Good answer

Reading between the lines you do not know anything, your guys reckoned San jose was solid and it is not, I advised you to be careful but what is galling is you fail to understand that the 300 million of assets is outside the reaches of any class action on the Santa Ana site, because it is a seperate company.

Just like Llanera, the directors of that company are well set in martinque and other tax shelters and your lack of due dilligence has meant you carried on selling a flawed development


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 5:14 PM by arnoldg Star rating. 49 forum posts Send private message

Don

Could you comment on the following statement you made

Deposits that have been taken on properties on these developments are safeguarded by bank guarantees and indeed, there is no indication that the original plans and timescales will not be met and therefore a default situation is not likely to arise.

Do all of your clients at these developments have bank guarentees??

A significant number of people including myself do not have bank guarantees so our money is not safe is it?

Gary Arnold

 




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 5:20 PM by Don Ross Star rating. 7 forum posts Send private message

As I have said, I can only speak for those who invested with us, however, I believe that through the Voluntary Administration process that San Jose have applied for, the court recognises the deposits of investors. San Jose have told me that they will be contacting all their clients, as will the court, so you should hear in the very near future exactly what your individual position is. Again I would recommend not reacting to rumour and hype and wait for the facts to emerge.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 5:36 PM by arnoldg Star rating. 49 forum posts Send private message

Don

Thank you for that but not sure you have answered my question, have all those that invested through you have bank guarantees??

Gary




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 5:38 PM by Don Ross Star rating. 7 forum posts Send private message

15 May 2008 5:41 PM by arnoldg Star rating. 49 forum posts Send private message

Many thanks, we should all have purchased through you and would all have bank guarantees and no worries!!

 




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 5:56 PM by arnoldg Star rating. 49 forum posts Send private message

Don,

One last question but if you don't feel you want to comment then that is fine.

Do you think the Agents and associated lawyers that let those of us go ahead without bank guarantees have been negligent?

Gary




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

15 May 2008 6:01 PM by Don Ross Star rating. 7 forum posts Send private message

That is really something I wouldn't wish to comment on. We have a process of due diligence which we pursue prior to bringing any investment opportunity to the attention of our members and we always look to ensure that investments are as well protected as they can be. There is always an element of risk in every investment, however, we seek to minimise these through such measures as bank guarantees.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

Pages: 1 |
Post reply   Start new thread


Previous Threads

Help Needed - 6 posts
Apostille and Embassy Legalization on Buying Property - 8 posts
God its cold!!!! - 17 posts
Long Let Security against bad tenants - 8 posts
Off-plan delays - 5 posts
anyone buying on R19? - 6 posts
billy - 2 posts
spanish to english. - 5 posts
Zeniamar - 4 posts
Snagging Inspections - 0 posts
Help Me Out - 7 posts
British beds or Spanish - 21 posts
Broadband on the Costa Blanca - 5 posts
Viva estates watch - 1 posts
Long term Rental Cabopino to Elviria Desperatley needed - 6 posts
hi - 3 posts
Santa Ana Del Monte Completion Dates For 2007 - 46 posts
Euro Anglo Sur (prestige Villas) - 7 posts
Holiday Rentals & Management in Duquesa Area - 17 posts
Request - 6 posts
Costs and Proceedures of buying in Spain - 1 posts
Air Con - 1 posts
Sky Digital box with remote and ITV card - 10 posts

11 posts were found:


1 |
Our Weekly Email Digest
Name:
Email:


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x