OK, below the belt....I concede, yes.....a bit. But only because I am
passionate about what I believe in, and that is that buying and selling privately really works, and has very real and tangible benefits for both buyers and sellers.
Private selling is NOT about getting rid of agents entirely.
It is about exploring another avenue, in an attempt to try and bring about a sale at a point as close to the 'asking price' as possible.
Buyers and sellers (and agents) all too often get 'hooked up' on
valuations involving complicated 'banking systems', 'comparables' & 'market forces' (which bamboozle sellers). instead of concentrating on getting the
asking price right.
Valuations are NOT the same as asking prices, and in the case of the seller, He or she
knows what they paid for their home, how long they have owned it, and what kind of money they need to walk away from it with, in order to finance their next purchase.
They also
know what local 'similar' properties are on the market for, and what price,any recently sold properties have sold at.........and if they don't, then selling privately takes you down the route of finding out.
And yes, of course, agents can be a big help here too, because they are a very rich resource of information when it comes to the above, and a good agent should factor all of the above into the equation, when suggesting the
asking price to initially market the property at.
But that price will
always, of course be higher with an agent, than it need be when selling privately....and THAT is the key benefit for sellers, because it can lead to a quicker sale, because of an immediate
edge over similar properties in the area - AND for buyers, because they can achieve better value for money and get more bricks & mortar for their outlay than they could if they bought through an agent.
For a seller, If trying to achieve a sale privately, direct from the current owner does nothing more than galvanise existing agents who have the property on their books, into trying a little harder in order to minimise the chances of a lost commission, then it can only be a good thing. (even perversely, for the agent - if that results in a sale though them for their extra effort
).
For the buyer, if a realistic offer that they make is accepted on a privately advertised property at a much lower asking price than through an Estate agent. They WILL save thousands.
They can then easily pay for translators, interpretors, chapperones etc to assist them with ALL aspects of moving to Spain they are unsure about, for a fraction of the costs of buying through an agent, because of the savings made on the sale price.
Georgia said:-
"would you let anyone in your home unacompanied on their say so without taking proof of ID as we do?"
Honestly...No I definately would not. But using a website like mine is not like advertising in 'Exchange & Mart' or 'Daltons Weekly'.
The seller gets contacted through the website (the first line of defence against spam and scam) and any interested party gives the seller
their details NOT vice-versa, so all communication is conducted on the sellers terms.
The seller alone decides via emails and then maybe later by a further qualifying telephone conversation or two, whether to proceed to the point of conducting a viewing. And ultimately (whether ID is shown or not), how do we really know if
anybody is 100% trustworthy. The fact is, we dont. And neither, Georgia (if you are honest) do you.
At the end of the day, all I am trying to say is that the seller is fully in charge, and in control of the whole process. And that if common sense and a generous dose of caution is applied, I think most people who may have ulterior motives for wanting to view a house will be put off at a very early stage.
Rixxy said:-
"because we have given of our time and advice freely and CONTRIBUTE to this site - unlike yourself."
Am I not allowed to join a debate, and offer an opinion on a thread topic just because I have only just arrived on the scene?
My contributions may not equal yours in number, but does that automatically make my points any less vaild?
The basis for your arguments to issues that I have raised, seem to be based solely on placing the blame for unsold properties squarely on the shoulders of the property owners themselves. Who all ask too much of buyers, and whom should not expect to get what they want for their home.....Sorry, but I disagree with that.
If an Estate agent is restricting a seller or buyer in any way, or is trying to dissuade a client or potential client from selling property privately…..then they should ask themselves, ‘Why?'
Actually, I think you are right Rixxy, in your closing statement. - Readers of this forum
will make up there own minds....explore ALL avenues, and add as many 'strings to their bow' (sorry, terrible cliche
) as possible.
This message was last edited by ssd on 9/13/2007.