Don't get me started on administrators.
A month ago we left ours with 5 simple tasks to carry out - a couple of letters, obtaining a couple of quotes for work needed, the usual stuff. As many of you know, I am no longer the president and keep trying to avoid getting dragged back into things, but the current president isn't exactly on the ball, hence I had meeting a month ago with the vice pres. & admin for the above matters to be actioned. And NOTHING has happened. I reminded the president to chase the admin, and the result was the wrong letter getting sent and various excuses for the other inactivity.
Without a decent administrator on board, the president's life can be a right misery. By the way, Justin - male.
One word of advice. Many members here are buyers of new property, and the subject of developer appointed administrators has come up often, usually with the same response, that this represents a potential conflict of interests and should therefore be avoided.
Our building is now almost 5 years old, and we are still findng out things we didn't know - such as the water pump sytem in the basement should be serviced regularly. Failure to do so can result in a €900 repair bill 5 years on. A good administrator should, in my opinion, be aware of things like this, and when taking charge of a new community, should do a thorough reccy of the property to familiarise him/herself with the various installations etc. Since the president is an unwilling and unpaid "volunteer", who usually changes every year, and is not elected on his/her technical knowledge of the inner workings of a modern building, it is ludicrous to expect them to be fully aware of everythng that needs maintaining. So unless the community is large enough to employ a dedicated maintenance contractor, the administrator really needs to be the one who ensures that nothing gets overlooked.
In our case, I now believe we would have been wise to accept the developer's adminsitrator (a sister company) at least for the first year, so that maintenance contracts or schedules could have been set up and all documentation (instruction manuals, warranties etc) could have been handed over by the developer without any problems. Being a sister company, I'm certain that they would have been made fully aware of all the installations and their correct functioning. As it is, we have an administrator who rarely visits the property, let alone knows anything about it, and a developer who is uncooperative, at best.
That turned into a bit of a rant I'm afraid, and was more than one word, but you get my drift?