Are Banks willing to lend to the property sector ?

Sue I could see your point about Tony if he had never been warned not to believe all that SJ tell him and had no previous knowledge of their ability to tell purchasers lie after lie over many years .

 Sue

Tony has said many things which he has been fed by san jose. this is excusable and he has as much right to believe them as I have to find them scum. If this was it then I would think him foolish but respect his opinion. I cannot go into specifics as it includes legal stuff being worked on presently

My beef with Tony comes when he starts to elaborate and back up things that san jose have told him. I.e he will say he has seen extracts from group solicitors which prove conversations between the administrators and san jose, and says that the group solicitors have lied about their dealings with the administrators and directors

To say that san jose has told him that and he believes it is fine. To maintain that he has seen things in writing which I factually know could not possibly exist is different. When he is asked to prove things he disappears for a week and then returns wit no answers

It is one thing to agree with san jose but Tony goes that one step further and tries to legitimise some of their lies by saying he has personally read or seen things that cannot possibly exist.

That is why I find Tony abhorent. If he simply had a different opinion than mine ten so be it

"When he is asked to prove things he disappears for a week and then returns wit no answers" Yes, but you forget he has to get in touch with "the leader" to seek instructions. Do you honestly thing that he could respond himself?