The Court process in Spain is totally different to that which we have here in the UK and so as such the various stages and procedures are somewhat (a) convoluted and (b) difficult to appreciate. Civil litigation is handled through the Mercantile Courts (as was my original claim against Solera) and when the “Criminal” element became apparent a completely new and separate process was begun … a “Querella Criminale”. Unlike the UK this is investigated by the COURTS and NOT the POLICE. This is the long winded and time consuming part of the process and in my case has taken just over 3 years.
The “Plaintiff’s” case is presented by the Lawyer to the Court in the form of a “complaint” (Querella) to which the “Defendant” (Aguilera) makes his Defence in exactly the same way as you would to any Court in front of the Judge. Together with his witness’ he has the opportunity to make sworn testimony to the Courts which in this case formed a “denial”. Interestingly Antonio Martinez would NOT speak as a witness and so instead Aguilera called Andrew Wild (a man who claimed to be a friend and yet physically threatened me for resisting the sale to Mr and Mrs Philips), Richard Cummins … a man whom I have never met and who claims was asked by me to sell the house, Maria from the office who was forced to admit she had no part in the transaction and then of course Mey. Mey too I understand agreed that I held a valid contract for the property and had paid over approaching 200,000 Euros for its purchase. The Court, naturally found in my favour with Aguilera remaining silent when asked why he did not repay the money. However neither my wife or I were required to be present at any of this and so I am relying upon the Judge’s transcript / Judgement.
In Spain the Defendant can Appeal … Appeal the Appeal and then again Appeal again and Aguilera did just that!. The Court papers are then handed to the State Prosecutor (a bit like the CPS here in the UK only much more so) and he concluded that not only was Aguilera guilty of fraud (Estafa) but that he had absolutely no defence stating that there were no “mitigating circumstances” upon which Aguilera could rely. This ruling was made by the State Prosecutor on 13th February immediately after Aguilera’s final appeal was rejected. Following the Prosecutors initial demands he obviously reviewed the case and viewed it more seriously and so increase the Prison sentence demanded from 3 years to 4 years along with a demand for the return of all the money paid PLUS interest PLUS costs which I believe is in some way guaranteed by the Administrators of Solera, Abogados Monzón though I could be incorrect about that point. This of course does NOT obviate Aguilera’s requirement to pay AND GO TO PRISON. If he does not he will be made Personally Bankrupt and in Spain that means for life … his business career and ability to defraud others at an end.
Sadly that is not quite the end of the matter; both sides had 20 days to respond to the State Prosecutor … my Lawyer did but I believe Aguilera’s did not; then again what could he say! It would then be considered normal for the Defendant to attempt some form of negotiation with the Plaintiff in an attempt to mitigate what the final outcome will be. Aguilera has not done this I guess preferring the “hospitality” of 4 years in a Spanish Prison! The final part of the process will be when all parties will be required to repeat their positions (at which point I will meet for the first time the man I am supposed to have asked to sell my house along with “my friend” Andrew Wild who attempted to threaten me). However, given the fact that it has already been ruled that there were no mitigating circumstance and the “Estafa” is very clear … Aguilera DID sell my house and DID keep the money the final outcome is beyond doubt. Aguilera personally will have to repay the stolen money and will have to spend time in Prison. This is more than likely going to take place either at the end of July or early September.
A bit “long winded” but with the process being so “convoluted” it does require a degree of explanation. Thank you for your kind words of encouragement. Regards Andrew Wilford
This message was last edited by Andrew Wilford on 13/05/2012.