Sorry Jogary ... forgot your real point ... this is the best I can get for your tranlation. I am not sure what it all means but still!:-
Number 94 Monday, April 26, 2010 Page 21 119
III. Justice Administration
What Cinco de Murcia Social number
Autos 1.186/2008 7202.
N.I.G.: 30030 44 4 2008 0008641
01 000
No. Cars: 1186 / 2008 Dem
Execution No.: 255/2009.
Subject matter: Dismissal.
Applicants: Ramón Rodríguez Manzanera
Respondent / s: Trampoline Solera SL
Doña Lucía Sánchez Campos, Clerk of the Court Social
Cinco de Murcia number.
I know: That in the implementation procedure of this Court 255/2009
Social Followed at the request of Ramon Rodriguez Manzanera Against the company
Trampoline Solera SL, on Dismissal, has issued the Following:
Car
In Murcia, March 11, 2010.
Acts
First .- In this procedure from the parties, to
Ramón Rodríguez Manzanera as plaintiff and defendant as Each Other
Trampoline Solera SL, dispatching court decision issued Was Implementing
dated 06/30/2009, Which Was Accumulated execution dated 30.12.1909 No 401/09,
to cover a total of 16 548 € 98 in € 2,896 in principal and '00
concept of interest and costs.
Second .- Ignoring the Existence of assets to Have it
Aimed at the unsuccessful efforts verification of goods, made to
and under the Provisions of art. 248 LPL Was served basis to the plaintiffs, as well as
FOGASA to Designate the property or rights Which May Be Seized Without
That it within 15 days Have Passed Any argument made.
Legal Reasoning
First .- They Have the Arts. 248 and 274 of the L.P.L. That if left unchecked
Knowledge of the Existence of Sufficient assets of the debtor WHERE
exploi and seizure, Investigations must be from and to be Carried
unsuccessful, in whole or in part, insolvency order will be Given After hearing the Fund
Wage Guaranty.
Part
In view of the foregoing, it is AGREED;
a) To declare the Springboard Executed Solera SL insolvent
Total amount of 16 548 € 98 in € 2,896 in principal and '00
concept of interest and costs, insolvency Means for all Purposes
as provisional.
NPE: A-260410-7202
Number 94 Monday, April 26, 2010 Page 21 120
b) Corresponding Filing prior actions in the Book entry
this Court, Without Prejudice to continue execution if Hereafter
new assets of the debtor known.
Notifíquese this resolution to the parties and the Wages Guarantee Fund
Against the same warning him appeal May Be Brought Before
Within this court five working days from notification.
And eleven o'clock you sign, get delivery of the performing party certification for
Takes effect Before The Wage Guarantee Fund.
Car
In Murcia, December 30, 2009.
Acts
By .- First order dated 30.06.2009, It Was In These cars dispatch AGREED
Against the execution debtor's assets Solera SL Trampoline That Continues Today
for Ramón Rodríguez Manzanera.
Second .- By order of 30/12/2009, It Was Against Agree to dispatch execution
the same debtor, Which Is Still in favor today also in favor of Ramon
Rodríguez Manzanera.
Legal Reasoning
First .- The articles 36-1. and 37.2 º. Of the Law of Procedure
Before the court EMPOWERS Education Which Followed Against Several executions
same debtor, on His own initiative or at request of the interested party
Can Accumulate For Reasons of economy and Connection Between Various
Which bonds for execution is Sought, here concurrent
For These Reasons,
Part
Accumulate to run this Which Is Followed in this Court under No
401/09, Opposite the common debtor Trampoline Solera SL, Bringing the number
to execute '98 € 16,548 and € 2,896 in principal for '00
Interest and interim costs.
Notifíquese this resolution to all parts of These cars.
Mode to challenge: by appeal to present in this
Court Within five working days of Receiving it, Whose sole
Complaint SHALL NOT suspend the Enforceability of What is AGREED (Article 184-1
of the Labour Procedure Act).
Car
In Murcia, December 30, 2009.
Acts
First: In this procedure from Ramon Manzanera
Solera Rodriguez as plaintiff and the Springboard SL as a defendant has
Condemning the Judgement dated 16.07.2009 Latter.
Second: That the decision is final.
Third: That the Applicant is Request to Proceed with
Implement That decision enforced by, Since the defendant
've Not Been Paid the amount of liquid and Determined the amount subject to the
conviction.
NPE: 260410-7202 A-
Number 94 Monday, April 26, 2010 Page 21 121
www.borm.es
D.L. MU-395/1985 - ISSN: 1989-1474
Legal Reasoning
First .- The Exercise of Judicial Authority and by judging
Exclusively enforce Judgments lies with the Courts
Determined by the Laws and international treaties (art. 117 of the EC and 2
LOPJ).
Second .- The execution of the title Been in this Proceeding, Whether
sentence or conciliation (Articles 68 and 84.4 LOB) Was Initiated by the
part eleven o'clock and started it will be processed Automatically, the order shall "
NECESSARY Resolutions and Measures (Article 237 of the LPL).
Third .- If the title running order the payment of liquidated amount
and determined, Shall Be Provided Without prior request
Condemned the seizure of personal assets in Sufficient Quantity Their only
But the Appropriateness of Proceeding to the legal order if it Appears the Adequacy
of the Seizure (arts. 235.1 and 252 of the LPL, and 592 and Consistent
LEC).
Having Regard to legal concepts and others of general and Relevant
application.
I own:
Clear the way of constraint execution Ramon Request by Manzanera
Rodriguez v. Trampoline Solera SL and Decrees, Without prior notice,
seizure of property of the party Executed in an amount to cover the Sufficient
Sum of principal plus 6225 € '61 '00 € 1,089 for costs and Interest Which
budgeted, subject to final settlement and weitere.
To be Effective, Practise the Following steps:
First: It Requires the debtor to make statement about
Which property rights or Holds it, with the precision NECESSARY. Should, Where
married, Identify the People who have rights over her property and if They Are
Another subject to process, specify the ends of it are of interest to That
implementation. In the event That the real property is Encumbered with loads must
Also express the amount of the Secured Claim, and if so, the
outstanding.
Having Initiated the process, the exec. n º 51/09 of this court, to
Belonging to the property found Executed In Which lock, however, is
the present case pending the results to be Obtained in to Provide
accordingly.
Notice is this decision to the parties.
Against this order SHALL NOT be appealed.
And let this be a legal notification form to the Springboard Solera SL
in unknown whereabouts, I issue this to be inserted in the Official Gazette
the Region of Murcia.
In Murcia, March 11, 2010.
It the recipient Warns That The Following Shall be made in communications
bar of this court, except Those Which are of the form of order or sentence, or
question of location.
The Clerk.
NPE: A-260410-7202