Changes to aesthetics.

Geoff,

This has now drifted off thread a little and should be probably continued elsewhere on the thread it was started on some time ago (by somebody else, I hasten to add).

As everywhere, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Michael & JH Murcia sum it up perfectly - urbanisations have rules and if you read your contract you will see that exterior structural changes to the aesthetics of the buildings are not allowed. I personally, was hoping that maybe the 'Golf club' scenario might in fact help keep standards high and certainly hope that the property management commitee enforce the rules. The golf club I am a member of at home is made up of mainly level headed working class guys and I don't really see Condado being any different. I would like to reside in the resort I bought into and not a hotch-potch of a thousand different peoples view of what is acceptable and what is not. Quite happy with the way things look in their unadulterated state thank you.

I have loads of things to do with my time, but ocassionally I enjoy reading & replying to threads on this Forum. All for live & let live, but don't forget that works both ways by not being irresponsible and disregarding the rules that everyone else has to abide by.

Regards,

_______________________

Will & Jackie.

With changes in mind- can anyone direct me to a pic of what the new Foro is expected to look like? Think we found one ages ago- rectangle area with a central water feature but it looked one storey, do people who've been over recently think the Foro looks two storey's high- or could there be some apartments above the shops/bars/restaurants?

The photo of the site plan for the Foro is on Condado dated 21st of July 75955

When out it looked like it's going to be single storey with raised enterances as seen on the poster

Paul.