New storm for the board of directors of Inversol SA e Imperium SA, branchs of the joint-stock company San jOse Group. The controversial assemblies celebrated in August of the 2008 ended at a criminal complaint of several partners who the holder of the court number 2 of Orihuela has admitted to proceeding. As first inquiries the magistrada one has required the economic balance from the 2004 to the 2007, since presumed club crimes, concealment of accounts and swindle are investigated.
In the complaint they are mentioned to declare the seventeen components of the boards of directors of the two companies. Between the defendants she is the top person in charge of the San jOse Group, Jose Rodriguez, their children, their Antonio brother Rodriguez and a good number of relatives and close friends who conform the administration advice. Also one is mentioned Francisco Jose Rodriguez, who outside financial director of these societies and which resigned from his position, according to he says the document “months before not to be in agreement with the management… and that camouflaged the countable data by instructions of the president”.
The leaders of these companies will have to appear in the oriolano Palace of Justice days 1 and 29 of July to give their version of the denounced thing, as he affirms in the car in which the complaint is admitted to proceeding and to that has had daily east access. The plaintiffs assure that the managers created these societies “in order to deceive their shareholders and to take control for himself the bottoms and cash”, something that now will have to demonstrate in the courts.
The opening of previous diligences of this denunciation completes a horrifying year for the San jOse Group, since the first company and the Shod branch of the Tollo are in contest of creditors from May of the 2008. A group of partners critics denounced these information in the two annual assemblies that were celebrated summer the past. Both sessions ended controversy so that it was denounced, in that one occasion, that the accounts were not clear and that the votings on the matter were not democratic.
In any case now the partners founders face a complaint by presumed turned aside of bottoms and acts to the society Inversol Grupo Urbanístico SA e Imperium Urbanitas SA. In the first rule one notices that “the annual accounts were falsified showing the partners in the general meetings a state of the accounts and presenting/displaying another different one in the Mercantile Registry”. The difference in the balance is realised, as it relates the complaint, in the indebted games of treasury and, reason why in the 2004 and the 2005 a treasury was reflected “superior to the real one and credits against indebted inferiors to the reality”, assure.
They base them to the irregularities in more than 5.4 million Euros and it is alluded to that the financial director let his position not be in agreement with the management. For the supposed crime of falsification in the accounts there are prison sentences of one to three years. Another one of the facts that are denounced is a loan from Imperium to San jOse by 5.9 million Euros. The plaintiffs affirm that “to camouflage this debt the 8.95 percent from a property to Imperium was yielded and the debt by 4.5 million Euros was eliminated”. This land, located in the Mountain range of the Carche (Jumilla), maintains that it is described like nonurbanizable and of special protection. For this reason they indicate that “it is made see that the land has a value of 14.8 million Euros and its value with the object of the social object is zero, because to houses nor golf courses cannot be constructed”.
The plaintiffs realised one second appraisal of this land, in which she affirms that the loan of this part of the property “has a price of 331,000 Euros when they try to give a value him of almost six million Euros”.
This subject was brought to light in the Truth after the assembly of partners of Imperium. The plaintiffs remember in the admitted document to proceeding by the court that the president defended that “in his action he was supported by the administration advice and if had committed an error would correct itself and it has not been City planning will to clear nothing to Imperium to give it to other companies”, indicate the plaintiffs in words of the leader.