SARC REPORT

Not that I am interested in anything Almu has to say but I just wondered if  it will take SARC  the usual  ridiculous 4 weeks or so to write up the drivel ? Perhaps if they tried bullet points and left out the usual "In our opinion " bit at the end they could manage it a bit  quicker perhaps in three  !  I hope their spell checker is working !

This message was last edited by MAGICMEG on 4/21/2009.

MAGIC MUG

NOW THAT IS JUST THE TYPE OF COMMENT WE ARE NOW ALL SICK OF. FOR GODS SAKE WHY DONT YOU GIVE YOUR GUMS A REST ?

Taxi Pratt

Assume you don't agree MM should have an opinion if it differs from SARC?
Why should we sick of such comments when they are factual.
How long does it take for a couple of page translation. Is the spelling normally good?

Your name suits you parrot ,  Do you learn what to say  from SARC parrot fashion or can you think for your self  ? I would like to see you defend the truth and not SARC . Perhaps you should give your beak a rest .

 Richard is actually a really nice genuine guy just someone who is, like us all, concerned and frustrated about getting his money back. He has always spoken good sense and therefore is not someone who would ever be persuaded by SARC logic. He probably just doesnt want to tune in for the bickering.

It is sad that it happens but SARC do tend to have that effect on people. 

I am sorry but so far since Monday I have written 18 reports at work and 7 for the voluntary organisations I am involved in . SARC are shockingly slow .Makes you think it is not a straight forward account of what was said but a fabricated account to meet their own objectives . MM

Dearest Sceptic peg

 we tend to make sure what we put in our report is factual unlike your last posting

brianmags

R4 556

I want my house  and hope all get a positive outcome

Brian my last post was factual  , What about the SARC report must it be at a snails pace can't Zebedee bounce something together a little quicker .As I said you are not fabricating a literary work just trying to formulate a factual report ie exactly what was said   - or are you ? .

Are you waiting on Ermentrude's input  to the " in our opinion "  part to enable  SARC to  milk the report for all it is worth .

SJ /HdT must be thinking just like Dougal  "why buy a dog and bark yourself ! "  and then again there is Dylan saying chill people everything is going to be  cooooooool !

God only knows when Mr McHenry will finish the 18th hole and all this time poor Florence still thinks she is going to get her new house  very  very soon  .

And we all go round and round again !  and again ! and again !. and again !      Pleeeeeease !  

regards MM

"we tend to make sure what we put in our report is factual "    

 is this where we remind them that because it has been told to them it does not make it factual?????? I still think they have not grasped the definition of factual as we understand it.

Translation takes not time at all, it is getting the approval from the "leaders" that takes weeks.

Hi All,

I have noticed that the usual suspects did not deride or mention the intersting parts of the report.

That SARC has asked for a discount for purchasers for several reasons.

That a bank is negotiating to finance SADM and have visited the site.

No purchaser has been given special creditor status ( If you know who, wants to argue the point, kindly provide some proof and not just a lot of whaffle/inuendo)

I could go on but I suggest that purchasers read the report for themselves and then dicuss it with thier legal representatives.

We are keeping in touch with HdT and converying the concerns and frustrations of purchasers.

  I WANT MY HOUSE & A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

All the best

Tony R17 18

 Tony

What planet are you on? It is not down to the administrators or san jose to decide who has  credit against the mass. It is down to the judge. What do you think we are all sat here waiting for???????????

Your report is full of rubbish and you are correct no-one has been given credit against the mass that I am aware of yet but that is what we have all asked the judge to consider. I understand the decision is coming very soon.

In the interim some solicitors have pressed for a resolution of contract without the credit against the mass and this has been agreed with interest. This means already that this means re-financing is very unlikely near impossible as no-one other than you wants their house.

Your comments about the spanish wanting their house is complete fiction. show us proof and I can show you hundreds of spniah people who have registered in the courts for their money to be retuirned

Crawl back under your rock Tony..its the best place for you

Tony talking complete and utter TOSH as usual !!!!!!!!!!!

"I have noticed that the usual suspects did not deride or mention the intersting parts of the report."
Because there were none which could be considered factual.

"That SARC has asked for a discount for purchasers for several reasons."
One being to save the wealth they have already accumalated and secured for themselves.

"That a bank is negotiating to finance SADM and have visited the site."
To carry out valuations for future proceedings, hence surveyors were in attendance.

"No purchaser has been given special creditor status ( If you know who, wants to argue the point, kindly provide some proof and not just a lot of whaffle/inuendo)"
Tiger, nobody trusts you to offer any information, as they know who the sneak reports to.

"I could go on"
As you usually do with garbage.

"dicuss it with thier legal representatives."
The first bit of sense he has ever written.

"We are keeping in touch with HdT "
We know, which is why you are not trusted.
What does that feel like?