Wedneday 26MAy last day to sign at a UK Notary

Hi All,

The 26 May is the last day for signiing at a UK notary, as they have to go an have an apostile (stamp/seal) placed on them prior to going to the court in Spain. If you have not voted yet or are not sure if your solicitor has your POA & you wish to avoid HdT being liquidated and risking your money, it is your last chance to vote yes.

Regarding the agreement, it has been agreed by the Judge in the court, he had to OK it before it could be presented to us.  So it is viewed by the court as being deliverable & it is up to each and every one of us to decide what we want to do.

You all know my opinion , vote yes and save SADM,save your money and save your house

All the best to each and every one of you

Tony R17 18

Desperate and in denial  I think  !!!!!!!!

Hi All,

You may of noticed the angst style of JA's post below and also on other threads. If you compare it to mine,  I hope that you see a relaxed calm style of post. Therefore, I suggest that the only peron who is behaving in desperation is JA, who is not a creditor, has no vote & is still trying to get us to lose our money.

If you hav asked your solictor to vote yes for you ask for proof that it has been done. We have heard of "errors" occuring and your wishes, whatever they are, should be followed.

I wish you all the best & hope that together we are able to save our money

I WANT A POSTIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

Tony R17 18

I would advise everyone to follow their solicitors advice, don't be swayed by other vested interests. 

3 hours to go and counting.

I wonder if the extended deadline will alter the result !

Result just in time for my holidays oh and the Spainish holidays

Tony

Just a quick question, what is it  you think JA would get out of HDT not going ahead, because as you say she now has all of her money back and is no longer therefore involved financially, me personally i can't see how JA would get any kind of pleasure out of us losing our money, she just puts across her own views on what's what, agreed sometimes they are not overly kind towards you but i just don't see what's in it for her.

PS I too am feeling very relaxed

Kind Regards

Mark

Hi Glendale,

I have not a clue what is in it for JA & would not really want to start speculating as it may be for a personal reason etc.

Just finished a beer & off to bed.

 I WANT A POSTIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

Tony R17 18

There is absolutely nothing in this for me anymore and It would give me no pleasure at all to see anyone lose their money I have many good  friends  who are caught in this mess and I wish  only the best for them and all of you  .

The truth is that Tony's blind trust of what Almu tells him infuriates me.  I know  how SJ/HdT operate and have been involved with them for more years than I care to remember  ,I  am in touch with ex employees who also know SJ/HdT inside out and I simply believe that the course of action Tony is advocating will only prolong the inevitable it will not change the outcome only prolong it .SJ/HdT have a history of writing the rules in their own favour as they go  and this time is no different and will end the same way.

SJ/HdT know this and are using the system to buy time the outcome for purchasers will be the same be it now or later so why prolong the misery .

I also think that Tony's point of view is extremely unbalanced SJ/HdTs wishes are not what is the best for purchasers and Tony's point that criminal proceedings and mercantile issues will be dealt with separately is the most ridiculous argument I have ever heard .The very fact that criminal proceedings are pending tells us everything we ever need to know , where this warped point of view is coming from beggars belief !!!!!!! 

As for Tony's constant criticism of other purchasers lawyers while leading us all to believe how wonderful his own  "barrister  " is and how we had better believe every word he says because he is not just a lawyer but a B-a -r-r-i-s-t-e-r  !!!!!!!!!!!!  the fact  Tony that your  lawyer is a barrister  is a total irrelevance.What we all need to know is that the lawyers we are using are 100% independent ,100% professional .have our interests 100%  at heart and have  absolutely no conflict of interest in this case .

My lawyer was fabulous and came up trumps for me yet Tony slagged him off constantly ? Something tells me that Tony is not as relaxed as he would lead us to believe where some of these issues are concerned .He obviously has a few insecurities himself or he would not feel the need to remind and bore us to death  with how wonderful his "barrister " is and how ill advised the rest of us have been by our lawyers   !!!!!!!!  Truly it  all beggars belief  

PS  There is absolutely nothing in this for me anymore other than caring about  what happens to my friends 

 I place no store on the fact  that the judge is overseeing this or that he thinks the agreement is deliverable this is only because  SJ/HdT have hidden the true facts . It is 100% not deliverable and never well be .

The blame for all this is totally  down to SJ/HdT no one else and it will only happen all over again .Therefore I do not think them fit to continue Simples!!!!!!! Tony it may reinforce your denial complex  to think I have other reasons for my comments  but you are completely wrong I don't .

All I have is a good sense of what is right and what is wrong and this is wrong , The best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour  Simples !!!!! only time will tell !!!!!JA