The Comments |
Just thought I'd keep the thread alive and reiterate my stance if that's ok. The very thought of a clandestine meeting between Tony and that woman made my skin crawl. Roll on the Judges decision and get this over with.
I WANT MY MONEY BACK SOMEHOW, ANYHOW, WHATEVER IT TAKES OR HOWEVER LONG
That feels better!
Sal
_______________________
Sal
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Amen to that Sal, well said! Thought as I have mostly only read the last 18mths the least I can do is respond when things are quiet. Thanks to all who have posted over this time ,you have helped me stay sane! Regards Laura
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Im sure i contributed to a bit of your insanity as well Laura.......sorry
But....Sal is always the master of the down to earth statement....
LET THE SARCERS AND THE BUILDERS AND THE ADMINISTRATORS AND THE LAWYERS AND THE BANKERS.......AND ANYONE ELSE YOU CAN THINK OF ........KNOW
VERY LOUDLY
AND VERY CLEARLY
I WANT MY MONEY BACK AND I DESERVE MY MONEY BACK, THEY DESERVE TO BE SHORT OF MONEY, WE DESERVE TO BE SOLVENT.
Thanks Sal
_______________________
Best wishes, Brian
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
TONY YOU DISGUST ME
TAKE THIS TO ALMUND WHEN YOU SEE HER SHE CAN SHOVE HER RESOLUTION WITH NO INTEREST UP HER ARSE. SHE CAN SHOVE HER ALLEGED STATEMENTS ABOUT THOSE WITHOUT BG HAVING NO NO RESOLUTION UP HER ARSE. HER TIME FOR NEGOTIATION IS OVER
REMIND HER SHE IS NOT IN CONTROL. THAT ENDED SOME TIME AGO AFTER HER AND HER CROOKED FAMILY TRIED TO STEAL OUR MONEY.
I WANT MY MONEY BACK AND ALL THOSE WITHOUT A BG TO GET THEIRS. I WANT SAN JOSE TO SUFFER A LOT AND FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES AND BE THROWN IN PRISON
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Does anyone have her email address please. Im in the mood for direct talk too.
Many sensible folk have kept me sane over the months on this Forum. I tried very hard to stay as neutral as possible for as long as possible. It takes a while to work out the who's and what to believe, but once you do, daylight dawns Laura. I only wish I had information that could add value but I simply dont.
They have assets worth something even in today's market unless they can fit pockets of land into suitcases as well.. We deserve what is rightfully ours. I dont want more or any less, just what is mine.
We teach our children basic do's and don't, rights and wrongs, and they couldnt possibly believe in the The Teachings. Obviously they missed out on a childhood. There is a name for that isnt there???
Sal
_______________________
Sal
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Don't doubt that there are some assets, but bet the debts outweigh them.
Do you honestly believe that the landbank is owned by the holding company and doesn't have borrowings for the acquisition of?
Do you not believe that any assets would have been used for further borrowings?
If the above were correct, must be the only case in history where profits of a company were not taken out as directors fees, etc., to leave the company with little or nothing, so in circumstances such as this, directors are not normally hurt financially, but the company, its investors and customers are left to suffer the losses.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
You may well be right FIN. The longer they stay in business, take salary and drain any more of our money the better then if that's the case.
_______________________
Sal
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
remember to chase down all of these companies, try and find out were the crook jose ha stashed the money:-
Presentación |
|
SAN JOSÉ is the culmination of a dream conceived by its founder D. JOSE RODRIGUEZ MURCIA, and as a company, has grown with time and effort.
The company SAN JOSE is known for its trust, professionalism and quality.Quality workmenship by an active team of architects, engineers, solicitors, financial advisers, sales team, publicity and marketing amongst a few.
|
|
|
Improving the quality of life of our clients is what moves our day to day, by this we mean, our main interest is your satisfaction and because of this, we offer the maximum quality and always respecting the natural enviroment.
The philosophy that has consolidated this group of firms as one of the most important in the Mediterranean cast has been, on the one side, our respect towards our investors and share holders and also by the good taste, quality and the excellent workmenship.
Currently the main activity of the group is based on the promotion and construction of properties althought as each day passes, new areas are being explored.Proof of this are our projects which are being developed to this day and which are made up of amongst many civil and public projects.
|
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
I think personally its time this thread was put back on the top of the pile Tony as this is what MOST want without any shadow of a doubt. Yet again Ive sent this latest SARCO December up-date to my Lawyer and yet again its dismissed as misleading rubbish just wishful thinking. I dont deny anyone a dream but fortunately I woke up (as have many) a long time ago.
I WANT MY MONEY BACK HOWEVER LONG IT TAKES!
Sal
_______________________
Sal
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Sal.
We second that. We want our money back. NOTHING ELSE.
Bob and Pauline.
_______________________
Now Retired and have our money back in FULL via our bank guarantee. Bob and Pauline.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
It wouldn't surprise me if ALL SARCO members would love to have their money back, but know (some from their own stupidity), that there is no chance, so hang onto the thread that is left, which is to get a house at any cost and my guess would be that cost will escalate for whatever the reason.
Be good if SARCO members who would prefer their money back, would put their hands up and be honest about it. I personally know it is fact, unless some have lied in PMs to me.
It may be more acceptable to others then, who appreciate their predicament, but not the preaching of the SARCO Gospel.
I wonder which side "Tiger" would come down on. Here is the choice.
Would you like all your money back in say 3 months?
If you were guaranteed a house in 12 months, would you wait (assuming that there would be no increase in costs).
Simple choice. If guaranteed, either:
IWMMB
IWMH
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Hi all
To endorse Sal's sentiments, i want my money back.........big time.
Why do i want this?.....simple
Its not viable to have a holiday home on part mortgage in Spain. The euro is too expensive, the amount of holidaymakers is probably scarce at present, the existing build costs are too high.................no need to go on..................
Is the dream still open.......yes of course, the land will still be there when the market changes, nobody is going to run off with it.....so when there is a demand, the houses will be built,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,does it matter if its HdT, SJ, bodgitt and scarper or fred flinstone who builds them?................i dont think so..........im not put on this earth to keep the builder afloat, only mself and my family.
I want my money back and quick about it thanks.
_______________________
Best wishes, Brian
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Why don`t all the people on this forum help each other. Share all the information and translations from all of the complicated letters from Herrada del sanjose?? Lets all get our money back and enjoy 2009. Does anyone know what the truth is and what is hapening im not interested in gossip and slaging each other. I WANT MY MONEY!!!!!!!
Paul Blagden row 15/32
_______________________ Paul & Debbie
Row 15 No 32
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Hi Paul, and welcome to the forum.
I assume from what you have said that you have been reading the threads even if you have not been posting. Sorry, but our solicitor is useless at updating us, so I have no news yet to share, but like you would appreciate any updates.
We ate our 12 grapes at midnight and shared a bottle of cava, so are hoping that 2009 is luckier than 2008!
Regards.
Sue
_______________________
Sue Walker
Author of "Retiring the Ole Way", now available on Amazon
See my blog about our life in Spain: www.spainuncovered.com
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Evening each.
I finally had a phone conversation with my Lawyer on Friday who apologised for not getting back sooner. As far as the letter we all received, he already had this from the Administrators and basically we had responded as far as is possible anyway over the past few months via court. Basically we are all listed as ordinary creditors as they anticipated and there is now very little argument to it. Only the Banks, Government and employees got privaleged status. His synopsis of the Informe is, as many kind forum members already helped notify me of, is that HdT have debts that far outway there assets at this time. They cannot even afford to pay back privaleged creditors let alone anyone below that rank. As SJ have a 50% share in HdT it could well mean they will be drawn into the debts as they do have assets still worth many many millions and are not in HdT's financial position. My Lawyer's opinion is that.. yes at some stage in the future, it is likely that someone will eventually build on the SADM site. There is No financier on the horizen at this stage and it could be many many years before this land is built on. He asked me quite clearly to forget this route entirely. It will not happen. We have just as much hope of staying with the Court route and waiting 2-5 years for our money back. He did read the faxed SARC December Report and was as usual very dismissive of its contents. Who ever is in charge of running HdT have absolutely no influence in the business any longer. They are so much in debt I believe, like many others, that they will go to the wolves.
The only saving grace I personally have that I took out a second contract with SJ (in an exchange effort) and that is who we will be persuing now HdT is dead in the water for our money back.
The SARC Reports are misleading and very dangerous with a deliberate misuse of of heresay from a Company who has failed its clients miserably and still continue to wish to mislead - through Tony. I only hope everyone took a different route from what was being advised by this defunct so called group of people 'with your interests at heart!'. I think not. There has to be an ulterior motive which has now probably gone to the wall given the official financial status. Almunda or whoever have absolutely no say in HdT anyway.
I sincerely hope everyone protected themselves and only joined (if that's what you actually do??) the SARC thing, to pay lip service to but took your own legal action quietly.
I wish you all had your houses but I still want my money back even if it has to be 5 years down the line. I loathe this Company and they will get what they deserve for the greed and dishonest way they have duped us all over the years. I equally feel a good deal of dismay that Tony has been blatently duped and allowed himself to be in a position to spout false hope to genuine purchasers. Tony you must feel like a total idiot for being so gullible. I actually feel a little sorry for you nowadays. Im sure you meant to do the right thing, but you just wouldnt stop and listen to anything that did not agree with what you personally were being spun by HdT/Almunda. I think you should make a personal and formal apology on this site to members and finally admit you were wrong.
Now let the rest of us who know our status finally, share and help each other with shared information that is honest and given freely to fellow 'Creditors'.
Hope we all have a good outcome in 2009.
Sal
_______________________
Sal
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Evening Sal
Many thanks for giving us such a full report - hopefully our solicitor will get back to us on Monday, as we have had no reply to our emails and when we rang there was no answer. I may send you a PM next week to ask for the name of your solicitor as we have not been happy with the lack of information from ours!
Like you, I hope that everybody will be willing to share information, as we try to get our money back. If we work together we have a better chance of salvaging something.
I am sure that Tony will give us his understanding of the situation once he has heard from his solicitor. We have met Tony, and he is a genuine guy - even though it appears from what you say that he was mislead. If so, he is as much a victim as anybody else, so let's not abuse him.
It looks as if those of us without bank guarantees are unlikely to get any money back, or if we do get some of it back, it will take a long time. Should we all sue our solicitors now, as they should never have let us hand over our deposits without a bank guarantee, as it is a legal requirement?
Sue
_______________________
Sue Walker
Author of "Retiring the Ole Way", now available on Amazon
See my blog about our life in Spain: www.spainuncovered.com
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Sal I am so very touched by your informative from the heart post .The true situation is dreadful and any one who claims otherwise is a fool .Lets just hope there is something left to have but I doubt it .How can the bulk of the companies in this group walk away from this situation intact when we the innocent purchasers /consumers are left with nothing .I for one will fight on regardless .Until the truth is known.!!!!!! JA
Dick Turpin wore a mask!!!!!!!!!!!
One last thing. I gave up on getting my money back in May last year and I knew for sure I was not getting my house .Perhaps the disappointment has lessened with time .Can you imagine how bad Tony etc feel right now ? Hope may feel eternal but the longer you hold on! The more you will be destroyed!
This message was last edited by julie anne on 1/12/2009.
This message was last edited by julie anne on 1/12/2009. This message was last edited by julie anne on 1/12/2009.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Hod on a second now. lets not feel sorry for Tony. Tony has blatently lied about certain things and claims to have seen things that dont even exist and never have. When asked for proof he clears off and returns with some stupid answer.
Tony may have started out as a genuine guy trying to help but turned into a manipulating and lying piece of work. Even now he tries to lie and convince people that legal action is pointless.
Thanks sal for your posts ..I would disagree with your lawyer on several points however
1) The deal is not done. that was merely the administrators report. You can contest this with the judge. This has been done on may occasions before and allows people to have their status changed
2) The report clearly demonstrates that HDT has more assets than debts but not movable ones. The key to this is discovering what the asets are.
3) Currently HDT are still very much involved with the company..hence the continued problems we have all had.
I too however believe in a positive 2009. Tony you do not have my sympathy..you disgust me.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|