Why is there no proof that the money was there in July 2008

Expatica - Health
Post reply   Start new thread
New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 |

Residencial Santa Ana del Monte forum threads
The Comments
11 Oct 2008 12:00 AM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi ALL,
All I would like to know is why there has never been any proof provided that the deposits were there, as dated by Ana on the 4th July?  Some purchasers may have made choices based on this and as there is no money there, other than that for BGs I would like the proof to be provided fo all to see. Where is this proof?

 IWANT MY HOUSE
TONY R17 18


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

11 Oct 2008 3:05 PM by FriendinNeed Star rating. 789 forum posts Send private message

Suggest you ask your legal representative.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

11 Oct 2008 4:03 PM by joanie666 Star rating. 231 forum posts Send private message

who gives a toss what you think Tony. Thats what you have lawyers for. If you are relying on comments from anyone on a forum to make your decisions then you get what you deserve. Imagine the chaos if people believed the rubbish that you spout. Anna owes you nothing and nor does anyone else. You sang about how great your lawyer is - surely he can go to the court and ask for himself. Why is that so difficult for you to sort - being a "nhs senior manager" you should be able to do this fairly easily so you now have a task to do.. bye for now


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

11 Oct 2008 4:11 PM by arlene2804 Star rating. 127 forum posts Send private message

Tony,

From whom do you require the said proof suggest maybe it's time you changed your solicitor I am quite happy with the information and advice I have paid  my  solicitor .  

Old saying when you pay peanuts you get monkeys now that we have monkeys acting as waiters why not as your solicitor.


Arlene


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

11 Oct 2008 7:30 PM by briando55 Star rating in Yorkshire. 1982 forum posts Send private message

Tony

Why dont you get this yet...its straightforward enough.  The administration is there to inspect the books and accounts, unless they are crooked (and meeting people in town halls for lunch maybe is getting into that territory).

The only people who know the truth are those people.....the only ones able to demand evidence are those people.............dont listen to anybody else, they will say what they want you to hear.

Thats why......i think you are talking rubbish most of the time...its blind optimism based on tainted information.

Be carefull..............i said in in June and i say it now......be carefull

_______________________

Best wishes, Brian

 



Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

14 Oct 2008 10:41 AM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi All,
So no answer to the question of proof of money being held in an account has been given by any one! Lots of remarks but no proof. Now why am I asking? Well that is because the money is not there and those with out BGs need to think very carefully about what they are doing and what they want. As for you Briando, shame on you again as you can simply ask Martin about the money, as he said way back that it was not there.

 IWANT MY HOUSE
Tony  r17 18


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

14 Oct 2008 12:49 PM by julie anne Star rating. 1103 forum posts Send private message

Tony I can't believe with everything else that is happening that you are still banging on about this.  Have you not asked your lawyer or don't you believe what he says either .


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

14 Oct 2008 12:55 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

The point is whether people have been told the truth! If the document exists by now you should be able to post it. The fact that it has not been makes me believe that the claim that it existed and that the money was there was false. If that was false it means all of those who accpeted it and under took a course of action based on it have been misled and placed into a position that they may not of chosen to be in. That is what the point is!
 I WANT MY HOUSE AND A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony R17 17 18


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

14 Oct 2008 1:04 PM by julie anne Star rating. 1103 forum posts Send private message

Tony what is wrong with you ask your lawyer .The rest of us have and are happy with the answer.




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

14 Oct 2008 5:24 PM by malc Star rating. 143 forum posts Send private message

JA  no not all of us are happy with the answer,   all too often things are being said and not backed up.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

Pages: 1 |
Post reply   Start new thread


Previous Threads

Open questions for Tony - 11 posts
Tony Talks Tosh - 4 posts
Anna please take me back - 11 posts
SARC meeting with Almu - 2 posts
IWMMB - but still want a house - 30 posts
update on those with bank guarantees - 46 posts
We are all on the same side?? - 7 posts
The SARC dream is over - 0 posts
NO MONEY IN THE POT SO HOW DO YOU GET IT BACK? - 30 posts
Land Ownership - 5 posts
Mischief 2 - 12 posts
To someone who will never see his dream - 0 posts
PETITION FOR INTRODUCTION TO MEN WITH WHITE COATS - 11 posts
Computers - 19 posts
I Want My Money Back - 151 posts
tv show - 5 posts
Possibly the biggest joke of the year. - 16 posts
Interesting newspaper article - 1 posts
SARC - 4 posts
Reasons banks give for not paying out on BGs - 41 posts
shopping on China ebay and save. - 31 posts
Help please re urbanisation rule liability - 51 posts
holidayrentalhomes.com - 8 posts
insurance when purchasing. - 1 posts
Area Information Reqired - 3 posts

10 posts were found:


1 |
Our Weekly Email Digest
Name:
Email:


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x