Whenever I've been in the company of other owners (and I have to say it's always a pleasant experience!!), there's always a discussion about the snagging issues / suing the developers, etc. Whilst I remain open minded about the whole suing thing at the moment and don't have a strong opinion either way, it has occurred to me that the AGM's will be another opportunity to go down this route.
BUT, I don't think that this is a good idea and much valuable time is going to be wasted on issues that have nothing to do with the AGM. Most owners I have met or had pm's with are of the opinion that the best route is to get a working group together after we have the Presidents in place. This working group can then look at all angles, speak to independent solicitors and report back to the Presidents and the Owners, with costs, likely outcomes, etc. We have far more power as a group to do this than as individuals.
Tempting though it is, to swap snaggin stories and opinions on suing, I do feel the AGM's should be kept to order and kept on track (especially PM2 where there are so many owners) otherwise the important AGM decisions won't be made. As many owners will be there for the AGM's perhaps a seperate informal meeting regarding the non-AGM issues is the answer (preferably with wine included!)