| The Comments |
Just pushing the tosh down the thread a bit more hope no one minds ,shame we dont have a trash can thread then we could put all the tosh in there
_______________________
 Nothing surprises me anymore 
 but I am willing to accept that sometimes (although not very often ) I can be wrong ! 
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Tosh from Tony Tosh from Almu how much tosh can one forum stand .
_______________________
Nothing surprises me anymore
but I am willing to accept that sometimes (although not very often ) I can be wrong !
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Meg,
I can tell from your several empty posting that you have no valid response to my dismatling of your logic and are just trying to burry it. This is the " I WANT MY HOUSE" thread and we do mind. So just to make it easier for every one I have brought it back up & if you post some empty remarks rather than a logical explanation for you claims all will see through you.
All the best
Tony
TonyMal
19 Apr 2009 12:16 PM
Send private message |
Hi All,
The story telling and conjecture made by the some is quite extrodinary. Why are some so afraid of waiting for the meetings report that they have to whaffle away in a manner that reads like a bad B movie script and even push the mention of the coming report well down the page?
I quote from joanie666's posting below : "..reports would indicate that there was never any intention to build on Jumilla golf.. "
What an amazingly silly remark to make, we are supposed to believe that going through the process of getting the licences for foundations and then building them, landscaping the golf course, meeting with the Jumilla Mayor, commencing the gate houses, the avenues at the entrance of SADM and arranging BG's ( even though only 10 -20 % of purchasers got them) indicates that they had no intention to build! I am sorry but it is blatantly obvious that they had every intention to build & infact still do have that intention and the fact that some think that you can fool purchasers with such bad analytical judgement really shows why we should all ignore the daft rumours and remarks that are made by the same usual suspects.
I WANT MY HOUSE AND A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony R17 18
As for the meeting I repsot my previous posting :
TonyMal
18 Apr 2009 1:08 PM
Send private message |
Hi All,
We met with Almudena last Thursday & had a long meeting. I also went up to SADM, met with my solicitor & went to el Pinet.
We will write up the meeting report ASAP. I believe that it was positive.
I WANT MY HOUSE & A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony
R17 18
|
|
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Every one will see in the end Tony that you are wrong very very wrong .Did you read the news paper reports Tony or do you only read good news and listen to Almu's lies .
_______________________
Nothing surprises me anymore
but I am willing to accept that sometimes (although not very often ) I can be wrong !
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Tony
If I am am an idiot then so are the most respected papers in spain who have quoted this very same thing. To set up a dummy company to launder money is an illegal act. Just because they give a pretence of wanting to build does not infer that there was ever any real intention. Not conjecture but widely reported.
Have you read any of the newspaper reports and discussed Almus impending criminal charges Tony. I notice you have still not answered this question. I do not write the reports Tony only read them. there are links to them on this site so please note that it is not conjecture at all
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
I am surprised you believe everything you read in the papers.
Had the vote, taken last August, gone as Fran (Francisco)had wanted one wonders what his story would have been then. As it happens he lost 40 - 60.
_______________________
Linda Needham
La Alberquilla
Jumilla, Murcia
R4 308 For Rental
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Hi Joanie 666,
You are trying to dodge defending your silly remark with inuendo and totaly ignore the simple fact that it is as clear as the light of day to anyone with the capacity to think, that they had and have every intention of building SADM. I am sorry if that doesd not fit into you story book conspiracy theory but I stongly suggest that you improve you critical analysis skills. I do not mean that sarcasticaly but feel that you could contribute more usefuly if you managed be subjective and weigh up all of the data and facts prior to make comments based on a journalists comment.
I WANT MY HOUSE AND A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony R17 18
Below is the posting that I placed ealier and has not been countered.
TonyMal
19 Apr 2009 2:43 PM
Send private message |
Meg,
I can tell from your several empty posting that you have no valid response to my dismatling of your logic and are just trying to burry it. This is the " I WANT MY HOUSE" thread and we do mind. So just to make it easier for every one I have brought it back up & if you post some empty remarks rather than a logical explanation for you claims all will see through you.
All the best
Tony
TonyMal
19 Apr 2009 12:16 PM
Send private message |
Hi All,
The story telling and conjecture made by the some is quite extrodinary. Why are some so afraid of waiting for the meetings report that they have to whaffle away in a manner that reads like a bad B movie script and even push the mention of the coming report well down the page?
I quote from joanie666's posting below : "..reports would indicate that there was never any intention to build on Jumilla golf.. "
What an amazingly silly remark to make, we are supposed to believe that going through the process of getting the licences for foundations and then building them, landscaping the golf course, meeting with the Jumilla Mayor, commencing the gate houses, the avenues at the entrance of SADM and arranging BG's ( even though only 10 -20 % of purchasers got them) indicates that they had no intention to build! I am sorry but it is blatantly obvious that they had every intention to build & infact still do have that intention and the fact that some think that you can fool purchasers with such bad analytical judgement really shows why we should all ignore the daft rumours and remarks that are made by the same usual suspects.
I WANT MY HOUSE AND A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony R17 18
As for the meeting I repsot my previous posting :
TonyMal
18 Apr 2009 1:08 PM
Send private message |
Hi All,
We met with Almudena last Thursday & had a long meeting. I also went up to SADM, met with my solicitor & went to el Pinet.
We will write up the meeting report ASAP. I believe that it was positive.
I WANT MY HOUSE & A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony
R17 18
|
|
|
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
" journalists comment." is entirely different to a quoted report, as I am sure you will be aware.
Do not rely on a journalist's comments, observations and interpretations. Read the report.
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Hi All,
The report should be going out to the SARC members this week. It has taken time to write, as there has been so much information to digest and we feel that it is quite positive.
I WANT MY HOUSE & A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
All the best
Tony R17 18
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
"The report should be going out to the SARC members this week. It has taken time to write, as there has been so much information to digest and we feel that it is quite positive." 
OK, for a normal person it would be just a day, maybe two to read, digest and get translated.
Time the report is published with this lot it is out of date.
Of course what have an interest in reading it, just love to see what fools they make of you. 
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
sorry believe it or not I do not log on every day. Tony I am not believing newspapers they are quoting actual reports and meetings and there is a tangible source behind them
If it came to believing respectable newspapers or san jose.. well now erm.... thats a difficult one.
Talking about dodging questions. I stand by my comments Tony , some of the reports have had links posted on here for all to see with reports to back up claims highlighted within the articles.
You have managed to dodge a question I asked of you. Did you and Almu discuss the charges stacking against her for fraud and the possible jail sentence that may be coming her way???
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
|
Tony where is the link to the SARC site ?
_______________________
Nothing surprises me anymore
but I am willing to accept that sometimes (although not very often ) I can be wrong !
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
Hi All,
The report will be loaded up shortly and just for Magicmeg, who appears to be unable to spot the SARC link.....
If you click on view all threads from the SADM main page, there it is a the top of the page.....quite easy perhaps it is just a case of selective eye sight.
More importantly we beleive that the report is positive and of help to purchasers. As for the nasty and at times very childish comments being made by the very small nasty group, just ignore them. All they try to do is create discord.
I WANT MY HOUSE AND A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
TONY R 17 18
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|
|
Hi All,
The SARC report of the meeting held with HdT is now on the SARC website. The link is available on the SADM threads list "view all". Please note that it is a large PDF.
Linda and David Needham were invited to the meeting , as respected members of the SADM forum .
I WANT MY HOUSE AND A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony R 17 18
0
Like
Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know
|