I want my house

Martin Thank you for clarifying these points .I made these very points after the information which was sent to your clients was  posted .I was ridiculed for pointing this out .However because you had given permission for a previous posting of you info  it became apparent to me that some did not have the intelligence to understand what should and should not be posted here .

 You clearly show that SARC/Tonymal play with information and massage the facts.

Tony perhaps this now confirms to you and others that you should be very careful with what you post especially when it is clearly a mis representation the of the facts. JA

Lets not forget the arrogant / naive part both Barry 210357 and Linda Needham played in this Barry posted confidential info from lawyer to client and Linda then urged him to post more despite very subtle warnings from me that it was not wise .This just goes to show the lack of elective intelligence some show on here .I know for a fact Linda has shared all correspondence with her lawyer (Martin), with Tony/ SARC sometimes before other clients have even had time to read it. I have always said be careful .There are a lot of silly people on this forum who really don't get it. JA

Your quite right B, and I do sleep these days with some morals in tact (broke but honest hmmm).  Our conciences are clear and we did what we did in good faith.  (Wine also helps until around 3am despite medical opinion). 

I would like to send a thank you to Martin for being honest with the actual truth of the matter and clearing matters up for many.  For a Lawyer to post, its quite obvious how angry he must be at the misrepresentation to have felt it necessary to post such a statement..  

Almu may not respond to any begging letters but Im hoping Mr Obama will like his home baked apple pie and fluffy replica Cocker Spaniel ive sent first class today asking him to sort out Spain as well.  Worth a try....?

Sal

can anyone explain the difference between the two companys san jose and herrada del torro,

Hi Gambles

The way i understand it is there is a holding company called something like San Jose Grupo, or similar (check that because there are different companies with similar names).......being the main company.

Underneath this there are individual companies like san jose inversionnes and Herado del Tollo. 

The reason for it is to limit exposure as companies grow,,,in other words mistakes made on one transaction affect that company and not the whole company, its a sensible thing to do and it happens in business all over the world.

My take on it  is that the company Herrado del Tollo or whatever the exact name is, has been unfortunate in its ventures, perhaps santa anna was biting off more than it could chew for example.  The company San Jose inversionnes may have had better management, and is maybe not in the same kind of mess.

The little SL at the end of the names you may find mean the same as Ltd in UK...ie limited liability, which means one dosnt affect the other or the main company.

Do some research yourself Gambles but as your name suggests, its not the time to gamble......get into it and see what you are up against if you have investments.

I dont have any evidence of any cross subsidy between the companies so its early to get you worried about that kind of stuff if its not needed.

Hope that helps

Brian

Let me get this straight Tony

You are now asking the solicitor, representing the interests of many clients on this forum, to give you his opinion of what he thinks might be the case concerning re-financing.

Have you gone stark raving bonkers?  What are you thinking about man, a solicitor deals in facts and law, not your world of what may or may not happen.

Thats what we pay them for....facts, any opinions of outcomes are normaly based on prior cases and interpretations of prior outcomes.

What are you on?

I can honestly say I have never in my life come across a more stupid ,  arrogant  , ignorant person than Tonymal.

Either he can not read and right plain English or he is deluded .Do we need the men in white coats again .Tony you have clearly offended Martin and have mis represented the information  that was in the  letter to his clients that was posted on this forum . No correction ,no apology just sheer arrogance then the audacity to ask for his advice .If you were a more intelligent man you would understand exactly what he was trying to say and you would have realised like the rest of us what is going to happen and that  as usual you  have been fed  yet another cock and bull story from HdT  et al  .Does your brain not function  on it's own  can you not figure out  for you self what is going on does it  really have to be spelled out to you  like it would a 5 year old child .You are not a clever person Tony ,your sheer stupidity is just getting on peoples nerves  now.So why don,t you stick your report where the sun don't shine if there was any truth or answers in it you would not ge asking others what is going on .You and SARC have lost all credibility not that you ever had much to begin with .

Marin, whilst I appreciate and respect you legal knowledge, when you state "there are many assets (mainly land) worth much more than the debts.",  I would respectfully question you financial, property development and business knowledge, unless you have up to date evidence of valuations of the land and how such valuation are arrived at.
A major developer's land bank (with development consent) was re-valued at just 40% of the valuation just 12 months ago, yet when some of the land was offered to the market, the highest tender was just 15% of the valuation just 12 months ago.

Everyone is aware that long term land is an asset, however, when there are no purchasers for dwellings, there is no demand for land, therefore, land is currently of little value.

Hi all.

Well if i was in a sinking ship [literally] i dont think i would want many people posting on this site in it with me, because when sinking you are supposed to bale OUT not IN, like working together, you know what i mean.

Julie anne, you seem to like slagging Tonymal off: i.e. Either he can not read and right plain English. Well right in that context is spelt "write" and can not is one word. "cannot". When slagging someone off, take a few seconds to check your posting before pressing the button.

I am glad i am a good swimmer.   Bob.

Hi everyone

What many people seem to be forgetting is that we are talking about an inland development.  Judging by the amount of building in Jumilla (not a million miles away from the site at SADM), there is still a demand for housing here.  We have been looking, for example, at new apartments in Jumilla at a price of 130,000, euros whereas the townhouse we hoped to buy at SADM was priced at 129,000 euros, which in comparison is a bargain (though sadly nowhere near being built!)

Check out the adverts in Costa Blanca News, this week's edition, on page 85 and you will see that prices are still very healthy inland.

Sue & John - living in Jumilla.

PS I haven't used spell check, but hopefully there are no errors!

For information:

"cannot arose c. 1400 as an auxiliary verb; it's an orthographic (i.e. written) variation of can not. Either or is acceptable. Neither nor incorrect. You can separate them or join them. People usually join them."

Hawkings I don't intend sinking or swimming as for bailing out I gave up trying to bail out certain fools on here long ago .I can now see the shore .Shame no one listened!

As for your spelling comment I left my specs in work and am having a bit of trouble this evening. I will have my specs back on Monday and normal service will be resumed however Tony will always be  just plain stupid.